Federal Trade Commission v. AMG Services, Inc. et al

Filing 1086

ORDER that the Tucker Defendants' Motion for Leave to File Surreply in Opposition to FTC's Reply in Support of Motion for Order Directing Turnover of Assets (ECF No. 1069 ) is GRANTED. The Tucker Defendants must file their Surreply (ECF No. 1069-1) on or before November 16, 2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 11/9/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 *** 4 FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, 5 Plaintiff, 6 7 vs. AMG SERVICES, INC., et al., 8 Defendants. 9 10 11 14 15 [Tucker Defendants’ Motion for Leave to File Surreply in Opposition to FTC’s Reply in Support of Motion for Order Directing Turnover of Assets (ECF No. 1069)] Before the Court is Tucker Defendants’ Motion for Leave to File Surreply in Opposition to FTC’s Reply in Support of Motion for Order Directing Turnover of Assets. (ECF No. 1069). 12 13 2:12-cv-00536-GMN-VCF ORDER Pursuant to Local Rule 7-2(d), [t]he failure of an opposing party to file points and authorities in response to any motion, except a motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 or a motion for attorney’s fees, constitutes a consent to the granting of the motion. Here, no opposition has been filed. It would seem that the other parties have consented to the granting of the instant motion. 16 Accordingly, 17 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Tucker Defendants’ Motion for Leave to File Surreply in 18 Opposition to FTC’s Reply in Support of Motion for Order Directing Turnover of Assets (ECF No. 1069) 19 is GRANTED. 20 21 22 The Tucker Defendants must file their Surreply (ECF No. 1069-1) on or before November 16, 2016. DATED this 9th day of November, 2016. 23 24 25 _________________________ CAM FERENBACH UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?