Federal Trade Commission v. AMG Services, Inc. et al

Filing 20

ORDER on 19 Joinder to Extension of Time to File Response to 4 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Kim C. Tucker and Park 269 LLC. Responses due by 5/4/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 4/16/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 4 FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, 5 Plaintiff, 6 v. 7 AMG SERVICES, INC, et al., 8 Defendant. 9 *** ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2:12-cv-00536-GMN -VCF ORDER 10 Before the court is defendants Kim C. Tucker and Park 269, LLC’s Joinder To Agreed Motion 11 for Extension of Time For Defendants To Respond To The Motion For Preliminary Injunction and 12 Other Equitable Relief (#12). (#19). 13 On April 11, 2012, several defendants filed an unopposed motion to extend time to respond to 14 the plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction. (#12). Defendant Robert D. Campbell filed a joinder 15 to the motion on April 12, 2012. (#14). Defendant Partner Weekly, LLC filed a motion for extension 16 on April 13, 2012. (#16). Defendants The Muir Law Firm, LLC and Timothy J. Muir filed a joinder 17 to defendants motion (#12) on April 13, 2012. (#17). 18 On April 13, 2012, the court issued an order granting defendants’ motions to extend time to 19 respond to plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction (#12 and #16), and extending the response 20 deadline to May 4, 2012. (#18). The court held that good cause existed to grant the extension, because 21 (1) plaintiff agreed to the extension, (2) counsel for defendants needed time to review the complex and 22 lengthy filings in this action, (3) the parties are interested in meeting in advance to explore alternatives 23 to litigation, and (4) the extension would provide certain defense counsel the ability to evaluate the 24 appropriate way to resolve the issue of whether defendant is a properly named defendant. Id. The court 25 stated that since defendants “Don E. Brady, Troy L. LittleAxe, Park 269 LLC, and Kim C. Tucker have 26 not joined moving defendants motion (#12) or filed a separate motion for extension,” the extension 1 granted does not apply to those defendants. Id. 2 On April 16, 2012, defendants Kim C. Tucker and Park 269, LLC filed the present joinder to 3 defendants’ motion (#12) to extend time to respond to plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction. 4 (#19). Defendants Tucker and Park 269 ask this court to grant them an extension of time, up to and 5 including, May 4, 2012, in which to file their response to the motion for preliminary injunction. Id. 6 Based on the court’s findings in its April 13, 2012, order (#18), good cause exists to grant defendants 7 Tucker and Park 269's request for extension. Defendants Don E. Brady and Troy L. LittleAxe have not 8 filed a joinder or a separate motion for extension of time. 9 Accordingly, and for good cause shown, 10 IT IS ORDERED that defendants Kim C. Tucker and Park 269, LLC’s Response to Plaintiff’s 11 Motion For Preliminary Injunction and Other Relief (#4) is due on or before May 4, 2012. The 12 extension of time does not apply to defendants Don E. Brady and Troy L. LittleAxe. 13 DATED this 16th day of April, 2012. 14 15 CAM FERENBACH UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?