Federal Trade Commission v. AMG Services, Inc. et al

Filing 267

ORDER Granting 264 First Unnopposed Motion to Extend Briefing Schedule re 236 MOTION to Compel Discovery Responses from Tucker Defendants and 4 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction. Opening brief due by 12/10/2012. Responses due by 12/28/2012. R eplies due by 1/14/2013. Sur-Replies due by 1/28/2013 re 4 Preliminary Injuction. Responses due by 12/7/2012. Replies due by 12/14/2012 re 236 Motion to Compel Discovery Responses. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 11/30/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 2 3 4 FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, 5 6 7 Plaintiff, v. AMG Services, Inc., et al., 8 9 Case No.: 2:12-cv-536-GMN-VCF [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENDED BRIEFING SCHEDULE Defendants, and Park 269 LLC, et al., 10 Relief Defendants. 11 12 13 Before the Court is the Agreed Joint Motion to Extend Briefing Schedule (First Request) filed by Plaintiff Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) and Defendants AMG Services, 14 Inc., SFS, Inc., Red Cedar Services, Inc., MNE Services, Inc., Scott A. Tucker, Blaine A. 15 Tucker, AMG Capital Management, LLC, Level 5 Motorsports, LLC, LeadFlash Consulting, 16 LLC, Black Creek Capital Corporation, Broadmoor Capital Partners, LLC, Don E. Brady, 17 Robert D. Campbell, and Troy L. LittleAxe (collectively, “Defendants”) indicating that the 18 parties agree as follows: 19 20 1. November 14, 2012 Order (Doc. No. 235), the Court set the following briefing schedule for the parties’ supplemental briefing on the FTC’s motion for preliminary injunction (Doc. No. 4): 21 a. The FTC’s opening brief in support of its preliminary injunction motion 22 is due on December 3, 2012; 23 b. Defendants’ responding supplemental briefs are due on December 21, 2012; 24 c. the FTC’s reply supplemental brief is due on January 7, 2013; and 25 d. Defendants’ sur-reply briefs addressing the arm of the tribe defense are 26 27 In this Court’s November 7, 2012 Minute Order (Doc. No. 232) and this Court’s due on January 22, 2013. 2. In this Court’s November 28, 2012 Order (Doc. No. 260), the Court set the 28 following schedule for briefing on the FTC’s motion to compel discovery from the Tucker 1 Defendants (Scott A. Tucker, Blaine A. Tucker, AMG Capital Management, LLC, Level 5 2 Motorsports, LLC, LeadFlash Consulting, LLC, Black Creek Capital Corporation, and 3 Broadmoor Capital Partners, LLC) (Doc. No. 236): a. The Tucker Defendants’ opposition brief is due on November 30, 2012, 4 and 5 b. the FTC’s reply in support of its motion to compel is due on December 6 7 10, 2012. 3. The parties’ efforts to reach an agreement regarding issues raised in the FTC’s 8 preliminary injunction briefing and its motion to compel are ongoing, and the parties believe 9 they are close to resolving these motions. 10 11 4. In light of their ongoing negotiations, the FTC and Defendants have agreed to extend the supplemental preliminary injunction briefing by one week, as outlined below: a. The FTC’s opening brief in support of its preliminary injunction motion 12 will be due on December 10, 2012; 13 b. Defendants’ responding supplemental brief will be due on December 28, 14 2012; 15 c. the FTC’s reply supplemental brief will be due on January 14, 2013; and 16 d. Defendants’ sur-reply brief addressing the arm of the tribe defense will 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 be due on January 29, 2013. 5. In light of their ongoing negotiations, the FTC and the Tucker Defendants have agreed to extend the motion to compel briefing by one week, as outlined below: a. the Tucker Defendants’ opposition brief will be due December 7, 2012, and b. the FTC’s reply in support of its motion to compel will be due on December 14, 2012. IT IS SO ORDERED: 24 25 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28 DATED: 11-30-2012

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?