Federal Trade Commission v. AMG Services, Inc. et al
Filing
33
ORDER on 31 Joinder to 12 Motion to Extend Time to File Response to 4 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction. Responses due by 5/4/2012. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 4/17/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
4
5
6
Federal Trade Commission
Case No.: 2:12-cv-00536-GMN-VCF
ORDER
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Plaintiff,
v.
7
AMG SERVICES, INC., et al
8
9
Before the Court is Defendant Don E. Brady’s Motion to Join Agreed Motion for
10
Extension of Time for Defendants to Respond to the Motion for Preliminary Injunction and
11
12
Other Equitable Relief (Doc. No. 12).
13
On April 11, 2012, several defendants filed an unopposed motion to extend time to
14
respond to the plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction. (Doc. No. 12). Defendant Robert D.
15
Campbell filed a joinder to the motion on April 12, 2012. (Doc. No. 14). Defendant Partner
16
Weekly, LLC filed a motion for extension on April 13, 2012. (Doc. No. 16). Defendants The
17
18
Muir Law Firm, LLC and Timothy J. Muir filed a joinder to defendants’ motion (Doc. No. 12)
19
on April 13, 2012. (Doc. No. 17). Defendants Kim C. Tucker and Park 269, LLC filed a joinder
20
to defendants’ motion (Doc. No. 12) on April 16, 2012. (Doc. No. 19).
21
22
On April 13, 2012, the Court issued an order granting defendants’ motions to extend time
to respond to plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction (#12 and #16), and extending the
23
24
response deadline to May 4, 2012. (#18). The Court held that good cause existed to grant the
25
extension, because (1) plaintiff agreed to the extension, (2) counsel for defendants needed time to
26
review the complex and lengthy filings in this action, (3) the parties are interested in meeting in
27
advance to explore alternatives to litigation, and (4) the extension would provide certain defense
28
-1-
1
counsel the ability to evaluate the appropriate way to resolve the issue of whether defendant is a
2
properly named defendant. Id.
3
On April 17, 2012, defendant Don E. Brady filed the present motion to join defendants’
4
motion (#12) to extend time to respond to plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction.
5
6
Defendant Don E. Brady asks this Court to grant them an extension of time, up to and including,
7
May 4, 2012, in which to file their response to the motion for preliminary injunction. Id. Based
8
on the Court’s findings in its April 13, 2012 Order, good cause exists to grant defendant Don E.
9
Brady’s request for extension.
10
Accordingly, and for good cause shown,
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
IT IS ORDERED that defendant Don E. Brady’s Response to Plaintiff’s
Motion For Preliminary Injunction and Other Relief (#4) is due on or before May 4, 2012.
DATED this 17th day of April, 2012.
DATED this ______ day of April, 2012.
________________________________
________________________________
Gloria M. Navarro
CAM FERENBACH
United States District Judge
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?