Federal Trade Commission v. AMG Services, Inc. et al

Filing 33

ORDER on 31 Joinder to 12 Motion to Extend Time to File Response to 4 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction. Responses due by 5/4/2012. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 4/17/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 4 5 6 Federal Trade Commission Case No.: 2:12-cv-00536-GMN-VCF ORDER [PROPOSED] ORDER Plaintiff, v. 7 AMG SERVICES, INC., et al 8 9 Before the Court is Defendant Don E. Brady’s Motion to Join Agreed Motion for 10 Extension of Time for Defendants to Respond to the Motion for Preliminary Injunction and 11 12 Other Equitable Relief (Doc. No. 12). 13 On April 11, 2012, several defendants filed an unopposed motion to extend time to 14 respond to the plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction. (Doc. No. 12). Defendant Robert D. 15 Campbell filed a joinder to the motion on April 12, 2012. (Doc. No. 14). Defendant Partner 16 Weekly, LLC filed a motion for extension on April 13, 2012. (Doc. No. 16). Defendants The 17 18 Muir Law Firm, LLC and Timothy J. Muir filed a joinder to defendants’ motion (Doc. No. 12) 19 on April 13, 2012. (Doc. No. 17). Defendants Kim C. Tucker and Park 269, LLC filed a joinder 20 to defendants’ motion (Doc. No. 12) on April 16, 2012. (Doc. No. 19). 21 22 On April 13, 2012, the Court issued an order granting defendants’ motions to extend time to respond to plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction (#12 and #16), and extending the 23 24 response deadline to May 4, 2012. (#18). The Court held that good cause existed to grant the 25 extension, because (1) plaintiff agreed to the extension, (2) counsel for defendants needed time to 26 review the complex and lengthy filings in this action, (3) the parties are interested in meeting in 27 advance to explore alternatives to litigation, and (4) the extension would provide certain defense 28 -1- 1 counsel the ability to evaluate the appropriate way to resolve the issue of whether defendant is a 2 properly named defendant. Id. 3 On April 17, 2012, defendant Don E. Brady filed the present motion to join defendants’ 4 motion (#12) to extend time to respond to plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction. 5 6 Defendant Don E. Brady asks this Court to grant them an extension of time, up to and including, 7 May 4, 2012, in which to file their response to the motion for preliminary injunction. Id. Based 8 on the Court’s findings in its April 13, 2012 Order, good cause exists to grant defendant Don E. 9 Brady’s request for extension. 10 Accordingly, and for good cause shown, 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 IT IS ORDERED that defendant Don E. Brady’s Response to Plaintiff’s Motion For Preliminary Injunction and Other Relief (#4) is due on or before May 4, 2012. DATED this 17th day of April, 2012. DATED this ______ day of April, 2012. ________________________________ ________________________________ Gloria M. Navarro CAM FERENBACH United States District Judge UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?