Federal Trade Commission v. AMG Services, Inc. et al

Filing 720

ORDER Granting 693 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Motion to Compel Exhibits Under Seal re 691 MOTION to Compel . Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 1/12/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)

Download PDF
C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 DANIEL G. BOGDEN United States Attorney District of Nevada BLAINE T. WELSH Assistant United States Attorney Nevada Bar. No. 4790 333 Las Vegas Blvd. South, Suite 5000 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Phone: (702) 388-6336 Facsimile: (702) 388-6787 Email: Blaine.Welsh@usdoj.gov JONATHAN NUECHTERLEIN General Counsel NIKHIL SINGHVI JASON D. SCHALL HELEN P. WONG IOANA RUSU LaSHAWN M. JOHNSON COURTNEY A. ESTEP Federal Trade Commission 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Mailstop CC-10232 Washington, D.C. 20580 Phone: (202) 326-3480 (Singhvi) Facsimile: (202) 326-3629 Email: nsinghvi@ftc.gov; jschall@ftc.gov Attorneys for Plaintiff Federal Trade Commission UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 18 19 20 22 v. AMG Services, Inc. et al., 24 25 26 PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE MOTION TO COMPEL EXHIBITS UNDER SEAL Plaintiff, 21 23 Case No. 2:12-cv-536 FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Defendants, and Park 269 LLC, et al., Relief Defendants. 27 1 Plaintiff Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) hereby moves this Court for an Order granting the 1 2 FTC leave to file under seal three exhibits to its motion to compel (ECF Nos. 692-1, 692-2, 692-3). In 3 support of this motion, the FTC states as follows: 1. 4 On August 15, 2012, this Court entered an order (ECF No. 145), sealing financial 5 documents (including images of checks) previously filed by the FTC as exhibits to its motion for 6 preliminary injunction. 2. 7 On January 11, 2013, this Court entered an amended protective order (ECF No. 308) 8 permitting parties to designate documents as confidential, and to submit such information to the Court 9 under seal. 3. 10 On October 24, 2014, the FTC filed a motion to compel against, inter alia, Relief 11 Defendant Kim Tucker. (ECF No. 691.) The FTC’s motion cites to various checks (arranged in three 12 exhibits) tending to show that the defendants have used corporate funds for personal purposes. (ECF Nos. 13 692-1, 692-2, 692-3.) The checks are redacted to obscure bank account information. 4. 14 The FTC does not take the position that the checks, as redacted, constitute “confidential” 15 documents within the meaning of the amended protective order, and the FTC does not contend that the 16 checks should be filed under seal. However, out of an abundance of caution, and as a result of the Court’s 17 August 15, 2012 order, the FTC moves to file these exhibits under seal to preserve any other party’s 18 ability to make the required showing for under seal treatment. 19 \ 20 \ 21 \ 22 \ 23 \ 24 \ 25 \ 26 \ 27 \ 2 1 WHEREFORE, the FTC respectfully requests leave of the Court to file three motion to compel 2 exhibits (ECF Nos. 692-1, 692-2, 692-3) under seal, with a reservation of the right to move the Court 3 at a later date to lift the seal order. 4 October 24, 2014 5 Respectfully submitted, 6 /s/ Jason Schall Nikhil Singhvi Jason D. Schall Helen P. Wong Ioana Rusu LaShawn M. Johnson Courtney A. Estep 7 8 9 10 11 Attorneys for Plaintiff Federal Trade Commission 12 13 14 15 IT IS SO ORDERED: ________________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 16 17 DATED: January 12, 2015 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 1 2 3 I, Jason Schall, certify that, as indicated below, all parties were served by electronic case filing with PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE MOTION TO COMPEL EXHIBITS UNDER SEAL filed with the Court and all parties were served by email with Plaintiff’s under seal exhibits. 4 5 Dated: October 24, 2014 /s/ Jason Schall Jason Schall 6 7 Via Electronic Case Filing: 8 Joshua M. Dickey (jdickey@baileykennedy.com) Attorney for Red Cedar Services, Inc. dba 500FastCash; SFS, Inc. dba OneClickCash 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Conly J. Schulte (cschulte@ndnlaw.com) Francis J. Nyhan (jnyhan@ndnlaw.com) Nicole Ducheneaux (nducheneaux@ndnlaw.com) Attorneys for Defendants AMG Services, Inc.; Red Cedar Services, Inc. dba 500FastCash; SFS, Inc. dba OneClickCash; MNE Services, Inc. dba Tribal Financial Services, Ameriloan, UnitedCashLoans, USFastCash David J. Merrill (david@djmerrillpc.com) Debra K. Lefler (debra.lefler@kirkland.com) Bradley Weidenhammer (bweidenhammer@kirkland.com) Charles Kalil (ckalil@kirkland.com) Richard Howell (rhowell@kirkland.com) Peter J. Wozniak (peter.wozniak@kirkland.com) Andrew A. Kassof (andrew.kassof@kirkland.com) Attorneys for Defendants AMG Services, Inc. and MNE Services, Inc. dba Tribal Financial Services, Ameriloan, UnitedCashLoans, USFastCash 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Von S. Heinz (vheinz@lrrlaw.com) Darren J. Lemieux (dlemieux@lrrlaw.com) E. Leif Reid (lreid@lrrlaw.com) Jeffrey D. Morris (jmorris@berkowitzoliver.com) Ryan C. Hudson (rhudson@berkowitzoliver.com) Nick J. Kurt (nkurt@berkowitzoliver.com) Attorneys for Defendants AMG Capital Management, LLC; Level 5 Motorsports, LLC; LeadFlash Consulting, LLC; Black Creek Capital Corporation; Broadmoor Capital Partners, LLC; Scott A. Tucker; Nereyda M. Tucker, as Executor of the Estate of Blaine A. Tucker 26 27 1 1 2 3 Jay Young (jay@h2law.com) Attorney for Defendant for Robert D. Campbell Paul C. Ray (paulcraylaw@aol.com) Alyssa D. Campbell (acampbell@laic-law.com) Attorneys for Defendant Troy L. Littleaxe 4 5 6 Patrick J. Reilly (preilly@hollandhart.com) Linda C. McFee (lmcfee@mcdowellrice.com) Robert Peter Smith (petesmith@mcdowellrice.com) Attorneys for Relief Defendants Kim C. Tucker and Park 269 LLC 7 8 9 10 Brian R. Reeve (breeve@swlaw.com) Kelly H. Dove (kdove@swlaw.com) Nathan F. Garrett (ngarrett@gravesgarrett.com) Whitney P. Strack (pstrack@gravesgarrett.com) Attorneys for Defendant Don E. Brady 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?