Federal Trade Commission v. AMG Services, Inc. et al

Filing 817

ORDER that 785 Motion to Unseal is GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that redacted copies of Exhibits 2, 10, 22, 59, 60, 61, 63, and 101 be filed by June 29, 2015. FURTHER ORDERED that Exhibit 102 (#781-108) remain sealed until the court orders otherwise . FURTHER ORDERED that 790 Motion to Unseal is GRANTED. Documents #789-1, 789-2, and 789-3 are UNSEALED. FURTHER ORDERED that 800 Motion for Leave to Seal is DENIED as moot. FURTHER ORDERED that the Tucker Defendants' memorandum in support of their Motion for Leave to Seal 801 is UNSEALED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 6/15/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1

DISTRICT OF NEVADA
2
3

***
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,

4
5
6

Case No. 2:12–cv–536–GMN–VCF

Plaintiff,
vs.

ORDER

AMG SERVICES, INC., et al.,

MOTION TO UNSEAL (#785)
MOTION TO UNSEAL (#790)
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SEAL (#800)

7

Defendants.
8
9

Three motions are before the court: (1) the Federal Trade Commission’s Motion to Unseal

10

documents related to the Commission’s Motion for a Preliminary Injunction (#785); (2) the Commission’s

11

Motion to Unseal documents related to the Commission’s Motion to Compel (#790); and (3) the Tucker

12

Defendants’ Motion for Leave to Seal documents related to their opposition to the Commission’s Motion

13

for a Preliminary Injunction (#800).
14

First, the Commission moves to unseal documents related to the Commission’s Motion for a
15

Preliminary Injunction. These filings are docketed as documents #780, #781, and #782. Each has attached
16
17
18

exhibits. Here, the Commission moves to “unseal the FTC’s motion for preliminary injunction filings,
with further redactions to Exhibits 2, 10, 22, 59, 60, 61, 63, and 101.” The parties agree that one filing,

19

Exhibit 102, which is docketed as #781-108, should remained sealed. The court agrees. The Commission’s

20

motion is granted.

21
22

Second, the Commission moves to unseal documents related to its Motion to Compel. This motion
is unopposed and the time to oppose has expired. Therefore, the motion is granted. See LR 7-2(d).

23
24
25

1

Third, the Tucker Defendants move to seal documents related their opposition to the Commission’s
1
2

Motion for a Preliminary Injunction. The Tucker Defendants ask the court to seal page 9 of Exhibit 9. The

3

court has already granted this relief. See (Doc. #805).

4

ACCORDINGLY, and for good cause shown,

5

IT IS ORDERED that the Federal Trade Commission’s Motion to Unseal (#785) is GRANTED.

6

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that redacted copies of Exhibits 2, 10, 22, 59, 60, 61, 63, and 101 be

7
8
9
10

filed by June 29, 2015.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Exhibit 102 (#781-108) remain sealed until the court orders
otherwise.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that he Commission’s Motion to Unseal (#790) is GRANTED.

11

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that documents #789-1, 789-2, and 789-3 are UNSEALED.
12

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Tucker Defendants’ Motion for Leave to Seal (#800) is
13
14
15
16

DENIED as moot.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Tucker Defendants’ memorandum in support of their Motion
for Leave to Seal (#801) is UNSEALED.

17

IT IS SO ORDERED.

18

DATED this 15th day of June, 2015.

19
20

_________________________
CAM FERENBACH
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

21
22
23
24
25

2