Federal Trade Commission v. AMG Services, Inc. et al

Filing 993

ORDER Granting in part and Denying in part 959 Motion to Strike 943 Objection to Document. The Tucker Defendants may file their objections (ECF NO. 943) and FTC may file a sur-reply not to exceed 10 pages to ECF NO. 943. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 5/9/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

3

***

4

FEDERALTRADE COMMISSION,
5

Plaintiff,
6
7

vs.
AMG SERVICES, INC., et al.,

8

2:12-cv-00536-GMN-VCF
ORDER

Defendants.

9

The Court has reviewed Plaintiff Federal Trade Commission's Motion to Strike Tucker Defendants'

10

Reply in Support of Rule 56(c)(2) Objection (ECF NO. 959), Tucker Defendants' Response to the FTC's

11

Motion to Strike (ECF NO. 968), and FTC's Reply in Support of Motion to Strike Tucker Defendants'

12

Rule 56(c)(2) Objection Reply (ECF NO. 972).

13

Accordingly,

14

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Plaintiff Federal Trade Commission's Motion to Strike Tucker

15

Defendants' Reply in Support of Rule 56(c)(2) Objection (ECF NO. 959) is GRANTED in part and

16

DENIED in part. The Tucker Defendants may file their objections (ECF NO. 943) and FTC may file a

17

sur-reply not to exceed 10 pages to ECF NO. 943.

18

DATED this 9th day of May, 2016.

19
20
21
22
23
24
25

_________________________
CAM FERENBACH
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE