Federal Trade Commission v. AMG Services, Inc. et al

Filing 995

ORDER that 994 Tucker Defendants' Motion for Clarification is GRANTED. The Tucker Defendants' reply in support of their evidentiary objections (ECF NO. 957 ) is accepted for filing without further action by the Tucker Defendants. FTC is permitted to file a sur-reply not to exceed 10 pages to ECF No. 957 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 5/12/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

3

***

4

FEDERALTRADE COMMISSION,
5

Plaintiff,
6
7

vs.
AMG SERVICES, INC., et al.,

8
9

2:12-cv-00536-GMN-VCF
ORDER

Defendants.
Before the Court is Tucker Defendants' Motion for Clarification (ECF NO. 994).

10

Accordingly,

11

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Tucker Defendants' Motion for Clarification (ECF NO. 994)

12

is GRANTED. The Tucker Defendants’ reply in support of their evidentiary objections (ECF NO. 957) is

13

accepted for filing without further action by the Tucker Defendants. FTC is permitted to file a sur-reply

14

not to exceed 10 pages to ECF No. 957.

15

DATED this 11th day of May, 2016.

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

_________________________
CAM FERENBACH
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE