Federal Trade Commission v. AMG Services, Inc. et al
Filing
995
ORDER that 994 Tucker Defendants' Motion for Clarification is GRANTED. The Tucker Defendants' reply in support of their evidentiary objections (ECF NO. 957 ) is accepted for filing without further action by the Tucker Defendants. FTC is permitted to file a sur-reply not to exceed 10 pages to ECF No. 957 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 5/12/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3
***
4
FEDERALTRADE COMMISSION,
5
Plaintiff,
6
7
vs.
AMG SERVICES, INC., et al.,
8
9
2:12-cv-00536-GMN-VCF
ORDER
Defendants.
Before the Court is Tucker Defendants' Motion for Clarification (ECF NO. 994).
10
Accordingly,
11
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Tucker Defendants' Motion for Clarification (ECF NO. 994)
12
is GRANTED. The Tucker Defendants’ reply in support of their evidentiary objections (ECF NO. 957) is
13
accepted for filing without further action by the Tucker Defendants. FTC is permitted to file a sur-reply
14
not to exceed 10 pages to ECF No. 957.
15
DATED this 11th day of May, 2016.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
_________________________
CAM FERENBACH
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?