Adele v. Dunn, Jr. et al
Filing
36
ORDER Denying 29 Defendants' Emergency Motion to Compel. A Status and Dispute Resolution Conference is set for 12/4/2012 09:00 AM in LV Courtroom 3B before Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen. Parties shall submit a joint status report by 12:00 pm, 12/3/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 11/26/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
7
8
9
10
11
12
CLIFFORD ADELE,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
LYLE JACOB DUNN, JR., et al.,
)
)
Defendants. )
__________________________________________)
Case No. 2:12-cv-00597-LDG-PAL
ORDER
(Emg. Mot for Court Ord - Dkt. #29)
13
14
Before the court is Defendants’ Emergency Motion for Court Order Compelling the Southern
15
Nevada VA Healthcare System to Produce Plaintiff’s Complete Medical File (Dkt. #29). The court has
16
considered the Motion and Plaintiff’s Opposition (Dkt. #34).
17
The motion seeks an order compelling a non-party, the Southern Nevada VA Healthcare
18
System, to provide Plaintiff’s complete medical file. Counsel for the VA sent a letter to counsel for
19
Defendants on October 19, 2012, denying the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) request for a copy
20
of the Plaintiff’s medical records. The letter advised counsel for Defendants that, pursuant to VA
21
regulations, a subpoena was not sufficient to authorize disclosure of an individual’s health information
22
unless a subpoena is signed by a judge or accompanied by a written authorization of the individual
23
whose records are the subject of the subpoena. The motion asserts that Plaintiff refused to provide a
24
medical consent and that there is no mechanism to obtain a judge-signed subpoena.
25
Plaintiff opposes the motion arguing the court should exercise its authority under Rule
26
26(b)(2)(C) to limit discovery of his entire VA medical file because of his privacy interest in his
27
healthcare information. Plaintiff maintains that he has only waived the patient-physician privilege in
28
this case to the extent of medical records reasonably related to the injuries involved in this lawsuit.
1
Defendants’ request for the complete medical file is overly broad in seeking all of Plaintiff’s VA
2
records for all types of medical care both related and unrelated to the injuries involved in this case.
3
Plaintiff represents that the Southern Nevada VA Healthcare System does not provide orthopaedic care
4
and that Plaintiff has identified all of the physicians who treated in him for the injuries he suffered in
5
the accident involved in this case. Plaintiff has also assisted the Defendants in obtaining the medical
6
records for these providers. Plaintiff contends that under these circumstances, Defendants have had a
7
full and fair opportunity to conduct discovery regarding Plaintiff’s injury claims, and the court should
8
deny the Defendants’ motion to compel Plaintiff’s complete medical file from the Southern Nevada VA
9
Clinic. If the court is not inclined to deny the motion, Plaintiff requests that the court permit Plaintiff’s
10
counsel to obtain the records and disclose only what is pertinent or that the court review Plaintiff’s
11
records in camera.
12
The subpoena duces tecum served on the custodian of records for the Southern Nevada VA
13
Healthcare System asks for the complete medical file regarding any and all treatment and care rendered
14
to the Plaintiff including, but not limited to, patient intake sheets, questionnaires, records, films,
15
billings, etc. The court finds the subpoena is patently overbroad in that it contains no temporal or scope
16
limitations. The court will, however, grant Defendants leave to apply for a more narrowly tailored
17
judicially entered subpoena. The court will also direct counsel for the parties to forthwith meet and
18
confer to develop a mutually acceptable narrowed subpoena or HIPAA compliant medical authorization
19
release for medical records relevant to Plaintiff’s injury claims, including any preexisting conditions
20
that may be relevant to Plaintiff’s injury claims in this case. The court will set a dispute resolution
21
hearing in the event the parties are unable to agree on a mutually agreeable form of release or subpoena.
22
Counsel for both sides are warned that the court will consider sanctions for an unreasonable failure to
23
reach an agreement on such a routine matter. Accordingly,
24
IT IS ORDERED;
25
1.
26
27
28
Defendants’ Emergency Motion for Court Order Compelling the Southern Nevada VA
Healthcare System to Produce Plaintiff’s Complete Medical File (Dkt. #29) is DENIED.
2.
A status and dispute resolution conference is set for December 4, 2012, at 9:00 a.m. in
courtroom 3B.
2
1
3.
Counsel for the parties shall submit a joint status report no later than 12:00 p.m.,
2
December 3, 2012, advising the court of whether they have resolved their dispute about
3
the scope of medical records to be obtained from the VA. If the parties have resolved
4
their dispute the hearing will be automatically vacated.
5
4.
If the parties have been unable to resolve their dispute the joint status report shall state
6
their respective positions with sufficient specificity to enable the court to resolve the
7
matter without further formal briefing.
8
Dated this 26th day of November, 2012.
9
10
11
______________________________________
Peggy A. Leen
United States Magistrate Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?