Trustees of the Bricklayers & Allied Craftworkers Local 13 Defined Contribution Pension Trust For Southern Nevada et al v. Contract Flooring & Interior Services, Inc.

Filing 24

JUDGMENT in favor of Plaintiffs Trustees of Bricklayers & Allied Craftworkers Local 13 Health Benefits Fund, Trustees of the Bricklayers & Allied Craftworkers Local 13 Defined Contribution Pension Trust For Southern Nevada, Trustees of the Bricklaye rs & Allied Craftworkers Local 13 Nevada, Trustees of the Bricklayers & Trowel Trades International Pension Fund, and Trustees of the Bricklayers & Trowel Trades Trustees of the International Masory Institute against Defendant Contract Flooring & Int erior Services, Inc. in the amount of $12,431.90, plus attorneys fees of $11,555.00, together with Plaintiffs costs of suit in the amount of $1,885.97, for a total Judgment of $25,872.87. Post-judgment interest shall accrue on the total Judgment amount. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 10/25/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)

Download PDF
Case 2:12-cv-00659-KJD -RJJ Document 21 1 2 3 4 5 THE URBAN LAW FIRM MICHAEL A. URBAN, Nevada State Bar No. 3875 SHANNON M. GALLO, Nevada State Bar No. 11967 4270 South Decatur Blvd., Suite A-9 Las Vegas, NV 89103 Telephone: (702) 968-8087 Facsimile: (702) 968-8088 Electronic Mail: murban@theurbanlawfirm.com; sgallo@theurbanlawfirm.com 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 CASE NO.: 2:12-cv-00659-KJD-RJJ TRUSTEES OF THE BRICKLAYERS & ALLIED CRAFTWORKERS LOCAL 13 DEFINED CONTRIBUTION PENSION TRUST FOR SOUTHERN NEVADA; TRUSTEES OF THE BRICKLAYERS & ALLIED CRAFTWORKERS LOCAL 13 JUDGMENT AGAINST CONTRACT HEALTH BENEFITS FUND; TRUSTEES FLOORING, INC. OF THE BRICKLAYERS & ALLIED CRAFTWORKERS LOCAL 13 NEVADA; TRUSTEES OF THE BRICKLAYERS & ALLIED CRAFTWORKERS LOCAL 13 NEVADA; TRUSTEES OF THE BRICKLAYERS & TROWEL TRADES INTERNATIONAL PENSION FUND; TRUSTEES OF THE BRICKLAYERS & TROWEL TRADES TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNATIONAL MASORY INSTITUTE, 20 21 Filed 10/11/12 Page 1 of 2 Plaintiffs, vs. 22 23 24 25 CONTRACT FLOORING & INTERIOR SERVICES, INC., a Nevada corporation; RODLYNN J. CASAS, individually, Defendants. 26 27 The above entitled case came on regularly for hearing on plaintiffs’ motion for summary 28 judgment against defendant Contract Flooring, Inc., and defendants’ motion to dismiss defendant 1 Case 2:12-cv-00659-KJD -RJJ Document 21 Filed 10/11/12 Page 2 of 2 1 Rodlynn Casas, before the Honorable Kent J. Dawson, United States District Judge, presiding. There 2 being no material issue of fact to be litigated at trial, and findings of fact and conclusions of law on file 3 in this action, 4 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiffs 5 TRUSTEES OF THE BRICKLAYERS & ALLIED CRAFTWORKERS LOCAL 13 DEFINED 6 CONTRIBUTION PENSION TRUST FOR SOUTHERN NEVADA, TRUSTEES OF THE 7 BRICKLAYERS & ALLIED CRAFTWORKERS LOCAL 13 HEALTH BENEFITS FUND, 8 TRUSTEES OF THE BRICKLAYERS & ALLIED CRAFTWORKERS LOCAL 13 9 VACATION FUND; BRICKLAYERS & ALLIED CRAFTWORKERS LOCAL 13 NEVADA; 10 TRUSTEES OF THE BRICKLAYERS & TROWEL TRADES INTERNATIONAL PENSION 11 FUND; TRUSTEES OF THE BRICKLAYERS & TROWEL TRADES INTERNATIONAL 12 HEALTH FUND; and TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNATIONAL MASONRY INSTITUTE, 13 shall recover from Defendant, Contract Flooring, Inc., the principal amount of $12,431.90, plus 14 attorney’s fees of $11,555.00, together with Plaintiffs’ costs of suit in the amount of $1,885.97, 15 for a total Judgment of $25,872.87. Post-judgment interest shall accrue on the total Judgment 16 amount. 17 Dated: _______________ October 25, 2012 18 19 20 21 22 23 _____________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Submitted by: THE URBAN LAW FIRM By: /s/ Shannon M. Gallo Shannon M. Gallo, Nevada Bar No. 11967 Counsel for Plaintiffs 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?