Hughes v. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
Filing
57
ORDER Denying 56 Defendants' Motion to Modify Date and Time. Attorney General shall file answer as ordered by 8/9/2014 unless the parties have reached a settlement that is memorialized in writing. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 7/10/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
***
7
8
MICHAEL RAY HUGHES,
Case No. 2:12-cv-0660-KJD-PAL
Plaintiff,
9
10
11
ORDER
v.
NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS, et al.,
12
Defendant.
13
14
Before the court is Defendant’s Motion to Modify Date and Time in Order (Dkt. #56). In
15
an Order entered June 26, 2014 (Dkt. #55) the court granted Defendants’ Motion for
16
Miscellaneous Relief and For an Extension of Time (Dkt. #54). Defendants requested relief
17
from a prior order requiring them to file an answer to the complaint within 60 days of April 18,
18
2014. The motion represented that on May 20, 2014, Plaintiff contacted several employees of
19
the Office of the Attorney General indicating he was interested in an early resolution. On June 7,
20
2014, Plaintiff communicated that he was currently living in San Diego County and unable to
21
travel because of illness but would have telephone service in 4 or 5 days and was interested in
22
settlement discussions. The Attorney General’s Office therefore requested an enlargement of
23
time to file their answer or other responsive pleading until thirty (30) days after a conference or
24
discussion.
25
The court granted Defendants’ motion for miscellaneous relief somewhat reluctantly
26
because of the age of this case. However, the court granted the request for enlargement of time
27
to file the answer until thirty (30) days after the parties had an informal telephonic settlement
28
discussion as requested.
The court made the informal telephonic settlement discussion
1
1
mandatory on both sides and set a date certain for it to occur as requested. Because of the age of
2
this case the court also set a date certain for an answer to be filed.
3
The motion for miscellaneous relief was filed two days before the defendants’ answer
4
was due and did not advise the court of any dates counsel would be unavailable to conduct the
5
informal settlement conference requested. The current motion was filed July 2, 2014 because the
6
assigned attorney from the Attorney General’s Office was scheduled to be on vacation between
7
July 5, 2014 and July 13, 2014 in a remote location without telephone or internet access. The
8
motion does not indicate that the Attorney General’s Office attempted to communicate with Mr.
9
Hughes by email or telephone. The motion does not indicate whether the Defendants complied
10
with the court’s Order (Dkt. #55) requiring them to communicate with the Plaintiff via the email
11
address he provided on June 5, 2014 to advise him that the court’s order had been entered and
12
that the parties were ordered to conduct informal discussions telephonically.
13
In short, Defense counsel got what it asked for – an order directing the Plaintiff to meet
14
with Defendants telephonically or in person on a set date and time ordered by the court for the
15
purposes of a good faith, informal settlement discussion. Because counsel did not inform the
16
court of any date or time counsel was unavailable a mandatory, informal telephonic conference
17
was set.
18
apparently made no arrangements to have another attorney handle the matter. The court assumes
19
the informal telephonic settlement conference did not go forward as counsel for Defendants was
20
out of state. The court has no information at all about whether counsel attempted to reach the
21
Plaintiff to reschedule another date.
It fell during the period counsel was scheduled to be on vacation, and counsel
22
Having reviewed and considered the matter,
23
IT IS ORDERED that:
24
1.
Defendants’ Motion to Modify Date and Time in Order (Dkt. #56) is denied. The
25
parties are encouraged to conduct informal settlement discussions, but under the circumstances
26
the court will not enter another order setting another date and time for a mandatory settlement
27
conference.
28
2
1
2
3
2.
The Attorney General shall file an answer as ordered by August 9, 2014 unless
the parties have reached a settlement that is memorialized in writing.
DATED THIS 10th day of July 2014.
4
5
6
PEGGY A. LEEN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?