Cruz v. Knight Transportation, Inc.

Filing 51

ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice. Signed by Judge Lloyd D. George on 06/11/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 9 JOSE FLORENTINE CRUZ, 10 2:12-cv-0682-LDG-NJK Plaintiff, 11 v. 12 KNIGHT TRANSPORTATION, INC., 13 ORDER Defendant. 14 15 On March 4, 2013, the court entered an order (#46) requiring plaintiff to respond to 16 defendant’s discovery requests, to comply with the magistrate judge’s order regarding the 17 “HIPPA” medical release, and to contact defendant’s counsel with regard to dates for plaintiff’s 18 deposition and the propounding of any of plaintiff’s own discovery. In that order, the court 19 cautioned plaintiff that if he did not fully comply, his complaint would be dismissed with 20 prejudice. 21 On May 7, 2013, defendant filed its request for a court order dismissing plaintiff’s 22 complaint with prejudice for plaintiff’s failure to comply with the court’s March 4, 2013, order 23 (#48). As of this date, plaintiff has not complied with the court’s March 4, 2013, order, nor 24 responded to defendant’s request for order of dismissal. Accordingly, for plaintiff’s failure to 25 /// 26 /// 1 comply with the orders of this court and pursuant to LR 7-2(d) (the failure to file points and 2 authorities in response to any motion shall constitute a consent to the granting of the motion), 3 THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. 4 5 DATED this ____ day of June, 2013. 6 7 ________________________ Lloyd D. George United States District Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?