Rembrandt Gaming Technologies, LP v. Boyd Gaming Corporation et al

Filing 234

JUDGMENT Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b). Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 6/16/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)

Case 2:12-cv-00775-MMD-GWF Document 231-2 Filed 06/16/16 Page 2 of 3

1
2
3
4
5
6

Barry L. Breslow, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 3023
Michael A. Burke, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 11527
ROBISON, BELAUSTEGUI, SHARP & LOW
A Professional Corporation
71 Washington Street
Reno, NV 89503
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 775-329-7941
E-Mail: [e-mail]
[e-mail]

7
8

Attorneys for Plaintiff
Rembrandt Gaming Technologies, LP

9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA

10
11
12

REMBRANDT GAMING TECHNOLOGIES, LP,
a Virginia limited partnership,

13
14

Plaintiff,
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT PURSUANT
TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL
PROCEDURE 54(b)

vs.

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Robison, Belaustegui,
Sharp & Low
71 Washington St.
Reno, NV 89503
[phone]

Civil Action No. 2:12-cv-775-MMD-GWF

BOYD GAMING CORPORATION, a Nevada
corporation; CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT
OPERATING COMPANY, INC., a Delaware
corporation; NEW CASTLE CORP., a Nevada
Corporation; RAMPARTS, INC., a Nevada
corporation; MANDALAY CORP., a Nevada
corporation; CIRCUS CIRCUS CASINOS, INC.,
a Nevada corporation; VICTORIA PARTNERS, a
Nevada partnership; MGM GRAND HOTEL,
LLC, a Nevada limited liability company;
BELLAGIO, LLC, a Nevada limited liability
company; THE MIRAGE CASINO-HOTEL, a
Nevada corporation; NEW YORK-NEW YORK
HOTEL & CASINO, LLC, a Nevada limited
liability company; ARIA RESORT & CASINO
HOLDINGS, LLC, a Nevada limited liability
company; WMS GAMING, INC., a Delaware
corporation; and LVGV, LLC, a Nevada limited
liability company,
Defendants.

Case 2:12-cv-00775-MMD-GWF Document 231-2 Filed 06/16/16 Page 3 of 3

1

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b), the Court hereby directs that a judgment of non-

2

infringement be entered on behalf of Defendants Boyd Gaming Corporation, WMS Gaming, Inc.,

3

and LVGV, LLC. This judgment does not apply to Defendant Caesars Entertainment Operating

4

Company, Inc., which is subject to an automatic litigation stay while it is in bankruptcy. The

5

Court directs that this judgment be entered as to less than all claims or parties under Rule 54(b) so

6

that an appeal can proceed on the non-infringement judgment involving Plaintiff Rembrandt

7

Gaming Technologies, Inc. and all defendants other than Caesars. The Court finds there is no just

8

reason for delay of the appeal while Caesars is in bankruptcy.

9
10

16th
IT IS SO ORDERED this _____ day of June, 2016

11
12
13

_______________________________________
Miranda M. Du
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Robison, Belaustegui,
Sharp & Low
71 Washington St.
Reno, NV 89503
[phone]

2