Lee v. Offices of the U.S. Attorney's et al

Filing 3

ORDER that plaintiff has 30 days from the publication of this order to file a new, valid check or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. If plaintiff does not comply then the clerk of the court is ordered to dismiss the complaint without prejudice. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 12/21/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 8 ROBIN M. LEE, 9 10 11 12 2:12-CV-781 JCM (GWF) Plaintiff(s), v. THE OFFICES OF THE U.S. ATTORNEYS, et al., 13 Defendant(s). 14 15 ORDER Presently before the court is the matter of Lee v. Offices of the U.S. Attorney’s et al, case 16 17 number 2:12-cv-00871. 18 19 Plaintiff filed a complaint and attempted to pay the $350 filing fee via a check. The check bounced when the clerk’s office attempted to cash the check. 20 Plaintiff has 30 days from the publication of this order to write a new, valid check. 21 Alternatively, plaintiff has 30 days from the publication of this order to file a motion to proceed in 22 forma pauperis. 23 ... 24 ... 25 ... 26 ... 27 ... 28 James C. Mahan U.S. District Judge 1 Accordingly, 2 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that plaintiff has 30 days from 3 the publication of this order to file a new, valid check or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. 4 If plaintiff does not comply then the clerk of the court is ordered to dismiss the complaint without 5 prejudice. 6 DATED December 21, 2012. 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 James C. Mahan U.S. District Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?