Gashtili et al v. JB Carter Properties II, LLC et al

Filing 48

ORDER that Counsel for the parties shall file a Joint Pretrial Order no later than 4:00 p.m. on 7/31/2013. Failure to timely comply may result in the imposition of sanctions up to and including a recommendation to the District Judge of case dispositive sanctions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 7/5/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

INTEGRATED DYNAMICS SOLUTIONS, INC., )
et al.,
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
vs.
)
)
JB CARTER PROPERTIES II, LLC, et al.,
)
)
Defendants. )
__________________________________________)
FASTRAN, LLC,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
NASROLLAH GASHTILI, et al.,
)
)
Defendants. )
__________________________________________)

Case No. 2:12-cv-00815-MMD-PAL

Case No. 2:12-cv-01156-MMD-PAL
ORDER

18

This matter is before the court on the parties’ failure to file a joint pretrial order required by

19

LR 26-1(e)(5). The last Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order (Dkt. #27) filed November 19, 2012,

20

required the parties to file a joint pretrial order required by LR 26-1(e)(5) no later than April 4, 2013, or

21

thirty days after dispositive motions were ruled upon. This case was consolidated with case no 2:12-cv-

22

1156 MMD PAL. Counter Defendants filed a Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. #29) December 4,

23

2012, which the District Judge granted in an Order (Dkt. #43) entered April 23, 2013 dismissing 2:12-

24

cv-1156 with prejudice, and dismissing all counterclaims in this consolidated case. The remaining

25

parties were required to file a joint pretrial order within 30 days after a decision of the summary

26

judgment motion. To date, the parties have not complied. Accordingly,

27

IT IS ORDERED that:

28

1.

Counsel for the parties shall file a joint pretrial order which fully complies with the

1

requirements of LR 16-3 and LR 16-4 no later than 4:00 p.m., July 31, 2013. Failure to

2

timely comply may result in the imposition of sanctions up to and including a

3

recommendation to the District Judge of case dispositive sanctions. See Fed. R. Civ. P.

4

41(b).

5
6
7

2.

The disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(3) and any objections thereto shall be
included in the pretrial order.

Dated this 5th day of July, 2013.

8
9
10

______________________________________
Peggy A. Leen
United States Magistrate Judge

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2