MedTrak VNG, Inc. v. AcuNetx, Inc et al

Filing 55

ORDER that 53 Proposed Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order is DENIED, without prejudice. FURTHER ORDERED that the parties are to file a revised Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order in compliance with LR 26-1(d), including a statement of the reasons why longer or different time periods should apply to the case, within seven days of the date of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 3/28/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
7
MEDTRAK VNG, INC.,
8
9
10
11
12
13

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
ACUNETX, INC., et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
__________________________________________)

Case No. 2:12-cv-00853-LDH-GWF
ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the parties’ Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order (#53), filed

14

March 26, 2013. LR 26-1(e)(1) provides that unless otherwise ordered, discovery periods longer than

15

one hundred eighty (180) days from the date the first defendant answers or appears will require special

16

scheduling review. Where such special scheduling review is requested, the plan shall state the reasons

17

why longer or different time periods should apply. The parties have not provided enough information

18

to support their request for a discovery period in excess of 180 days.

19
20

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order (#53) is denied,
without prejudice.

21

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties are to file a revised Discovery Plan and

22

Scheduling Order in compliance with LR 26-1(d), including a statement of the reasons why longer or

23

different time periods should apply to the case, within seven (7) days of the date of this order.

24

28th
DATED this ____ day of March, 2013.

25
26
27
28

______________________________________
GEORGE FOLEY, JR.
United States Magistrate Judge