Lee v. Ho et al

Filing 12

ORDER Denying 11 Motion for Default Judgment. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 8/9/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)

1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
7
8

ROBIN M. LEE,

9
10
11

2:12-CV-884 JCM (GWF)

Plaintiff,
v.
PETER HO, et al.,

12
Defendants.

13
14

ORDER

15
16

Presently before the court is plaintiff Robin M. Lee’s motion for entry of clerk’s default.
Doc. #11 (improperly filed as a motion for default judgment).

17

As the court explained in its two previous order denying default judgment, the record before

18

this court does not reflect that any of the defendants have been served. As such, there is no basis for

19

the entry of default judgment. The court warns plaintiff that if she continues down this path of

20

intransigence, by refiling baseless motions for default without first filing executed summons

21

establishing that defendants have been served, the court will issue sanctions, resulting in the possible

22

dismissal of this case.

23

...

24

...

25

...

26

...

27

...

28
James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge

1

Accordingly,

2

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that plaintiff’s motion for

3
4

default judgment (doc. #11) be, and the same hereby is, DENIED.
DATED August 9, 2012.

5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge

-2-