Lee v. Ho et al
Filing
8
ORDER Denying 4 and 7 Motions for Default Judgment. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 6/26/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
7
8
ROBIN M. LEE,
9
10
11
2:12-CV-884 JCM (GWF)
Plaintiff,
v.
PETER HO, et al.,
12
13
14
15
16
Defendants.
ORDER
Presently before the court is plaintiff Robin M. Lee’s motions for default judgment. Docs.
#4 and #7. The defendants have not responded.
17
Default judgment is appropriate “when a party against whom a judgment for affirmative relief
18
is sought has failed to plead or otherwise defend, and that failure is shown by affidavit or otherwise.
19
. .” Fed. R. Civ. P. 55. Obtaining a default judgment entails two steps: “first, the party seeking a
20
default judgment must file a motion for entry of default with the clerk of a district court by
21
demonstrating that the opposing party has failed to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint,
22
and, second, once the clerk has entered a default, the moving party may then seek entry of a default
23
judgment against the defaulting party.” See UMG Recordings, Inc. v. Stewart, 461 F. Supp. 2d 837,
24
840 (S.D. Ill. 2006). Where a party has not been properly served, there is not basis for a court to
25
enter default judgment. See Fairly v. Potter, 2003 WL 402261, *4 (N.D. Cal. 2003).
26
Here, plaintiff Lee has not filed for entry of clerk’s default. Accordingly, the motion for
27
default judgment should be denied as premature. Moreover, the record before this court does not
28
James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge
1
reflect that any of the defendants have been served. As such, there is no basis for the entry of default
2
judgment.
3
Accordingly,
4
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that plaintiff’s motions for
5
6
default judgment (docs. #4 and #7) be, and the same hereby is, DENIED.
DATED June 26, 2012.
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?