Jackson v. All Trade, Inc

Filing 25

ORDER Granting 23 Plaintiff's Motion for Voluntary Dismissal. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action be dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 11/15/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)

1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
7
DOUGLAS A. JACKSON,

8
9

2:12-CV-942 JCM (CWH)

Plaintiff(s),

10

v.

11

ALL TRADE, INC.,

12
Defendant(s).

13
14
15

ORDER

16

Presently before the court is plaintiff/counter-defendant, Douglass A. Jackson’s, motion for

17

voluntary dismissal. (Doc. # 23).

18

I.

Background

19

Plaintiff filed a complaint against defendant on June 4, 2012. (Doc. # 1). On August 31,

20

2012, defendant filed an answer and counterclaim to the complaint. (Doc. # 13). After various

21

pretrial motions and orders, plaintiff filed the instant motion for a voluntary dismissal. (Doc. # 23).

22

Plaintiff represents that on or about September 26, 2012, the parties engaged in settlement

23

negotiations. (Id.). On or about October 11, 2012, the parties reached a full and final settlement in

24

this lawsuit. (Id.). Plaintiff has attached the settlement agreement, signed by the parties, as an

25

exhibit. (Id., Ex. # 1). Plaintiff further represents that defendant “has fully performed under [the

26

settlement] agreement by fulfilling the terms” embodied in the agreement.

27
28
James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge

1

Defendant has not responded to the motion even though the response date has passed.

2

Defendant, as a corporation, must be represented by counsel to appear in federal court. United States

3

v. High Country Broad. Co., 3 F.3d 1244, 1245 (9th Cir. 1993) (“A corporation may appear in

4

federal court only through licensed counsel.”). Plaintiff finally represents that the “[p]arties would

5

have submitted a Stipulation and Order for Dismissal for this Court’s approval, but Defendant

6

remains unrepresented by counsel.” (Doc. # 23).

7

II.

Legal Standards

8

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2) provides in its entirety:

9

By Court Order; Effect. Except as provided in Rule 41(a)(1), an action may be dismissed
at the plaintiff’s request only by court order, on terms that the court considers proper. If a
defendant has pleaded a counterclaim before being served with the plaintiff’s motion to
dismiss, the action may be dismissed over defendant’s objection only if the counterclaim can
remain pending for independent adjudication. Unless the order states otherwise, a dismissal
under this paragraph (2) is without prejudice.

10
11
12
13

Further, local rule 7-2(d) provides that “[t] failure of an opposing party to file points and

14

authorities in response to any motion shall constitute a consent to the granting of the motion.” See

15

United States v. Warren, 601 F.2d 471, 474 (9th Cir. 1979). However, prior to dismissal, the district

16

court is required to weigh several factors: “(1) the public's interest in expeditious resolution of

17

litigation; (2) the court's need to manage its docket; (3) the risk of prejudice to the defendants; (4)

18

the public policy favoring disposition of cases of their merits; and (5) the availability of less drastic

19

sanctions.” Ghazali v. Moran, 46 F.3d 52, 53 (9th Cir. 1995) (citing Henderson v. Duncan, 779 F.2d

20

1421, 1423 (9th Cir. 1986)).

21

III.

Discussion

22

The parties have reached a settlement and fully performed under the settlement agreement.

23

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2), plaintiff seeks to dismiss the action with prejudice. Defendant

24

has not objected or otherwise responded even though the response date has passed. The court finds

25

that plaintiff has properly moved for dismissal under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2), and defendant has

26

consented to the granting of the motion pursuant to both Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2) and local rule 7-

27

2(d). In light of the defendant’s failure to respond and weighing the factors identified in Ghazali,

28
James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge

-2-

1

the court finds dismissal appropriate.

2

Accordingly,

3

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that plaintiff’s motion for

4
5
6
7

voluntary dismissal (doc. # 23) be, and the same hereby, is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this action, case number
2:12-cv-00942-JCM-CWH, be dismissed with prejudice.
DATED November 15, 2012.

8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge

-3-