Michel v. Williams et al

Filing 10

ORDER that the Clerk of the Court shall file the petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The Clerk shall add Catherine Cortez Masto, Attorney General for the State of Nevada, as counsel for respondents. Respondents have 45 days to respond to the petition. Petitioner's 2 Motion to Appoint Counsel is Denied. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 12/19/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA

6
7
8
9

DAVID WALTER MICHEL,

10

Petitioner,

11

vs.

12

Case No. 2:12-cv-00945-PMP-CWH

BRIAN E. WILLIAMS, SR., et al.,

13

ORDER

Respondents.

14
15

Petitioner has paid the filing fee. Pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254

16

Cases in the United States District Courts, the court has reviewed his petition for a writ of habeas

17

corpus. The court will serve the petition upon respondents for a response.

18

Petitioner has submitted a motion for appointment of counsel (#2). Whenever the court

19

determines that the interests of justice so require, counsel may be appointed to any financially

20

eligible person who is seeking habeas corpus relief. 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(a)(2)(B). “[T]he district

21

court must evaluate the likelihood of success on the merits as well as the ability of the petitioner to

22

articulate his claims pro se in light of the complexity of the legal issues involved.” Weygandt v.

23

Look, 718 F.2d 952 (9th Cir. 1983). There is no constitutional right to counsel in federal habeas

24

proceedings. McCleskey v. Zant, 499 U.S. 467, 495 (1991). The factors to consider are not

25

separate from the underlying claims, but are intrinsically enmeshed with them. Weygandt, 718 F.2d

26

at 954. After reviewing the petition, the court concludes that appointment of counsel is not

27

warranted.

28

1
2

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the clerk of the court shall file the petition for a writ of
habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

3
4

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk shall add Catherine Cortez Masto, Attorney
General for the State of Nevada, as counsel for respondents.

5

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk shall electronically serve upon respondents a

6

copy of the petition and this order. In addition, the clerk shall return to petitioner a copy of the

7

petition.

8

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents shall have forty-five (45) days from the date

9

on which the petition was served to answer or otherwise respond to the petition. If respondents file

10

and serve an answer, then they shall comply with Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases

11

in the United States District Courts, and then petitioner shall have forty-five (45) days from the date

12

on which the answer is served to file a reply.

13

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any exhibits filed by the parties shall be filed with a

14

separate index of exhibits identifying the exhibits by number or letter. The CM/ECF attachments

15

that are filed further shall be identified by the number or numbers (or letter or letters) of the exhibits

16

in the attachment. The hard copy of any additional state court record exhibits shall be

17

forwarded—for this case—to the staff attorneys in Las Vegas.

18

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that henceforth, petitioner shall serve upon respondents or, if

19

appearance has been entered by counsel, upon the attorney(s), a copy of every pleading, motion or

20

other document submitted for consideration by the court. Petitioner shall include with the original

21

paper submitted for filing a certificate stating the date that a true and correct copy of the document

22

was mailed to the respondents or counsel for the respondents. The court may disregard any paper

23

received by a district judge or magistrate judge that has not been filed with the clerk, and any paper

24

received by a district judge, magistrate judge, or the clerk that fails to include a certificate of service.

25

///

26

///

27

///

28

///
-2-

1

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for appointment of counsel (#2) is DENIED.

2

DATED:

December 19, 2012.

3
4

_________________________________
PHILIP M. PRO
United States District Judge

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-