Andrew et al v. Century Surety Company

Filing 207

Notice of Intent to Reconsider and Order Setting Hearing. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that oral argument on 192 Defendants motion for Summary Judgment, 194 Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment, and 197 Plaintiffs Motion to Strike, and this Noti ce of Intent to Reconsider will be held on Thursday, September 17, 2015 on a stacked calendar at 2:00 p.m. at the Thomas & Mack Moot Court Room at UNLVs Boyd School of Law. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 9/2/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PS)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 *** 4 5 DANA ANDREW, as legal guardian on behalf of Ryan T. Pretner, and RYAN T. PRETNER, 6 7 8 9 Plaintiffs, Case No. 2:12-cv-00978-APG-PAL NOTICE OF INTENT TO RECONSIDER AND ORDER SETTING HEARING v. CENTURY SURETY COMPANY, (DKT. #192, #194, #197) Defendant. 10 11 I have reconsidered a portion of my prior order (Dkt. #168) regarding whether defendant 12 Century Surety Company is bound by the default judgment entered in the underlying litigation, 13 and whether Allstate Insurance Co. v. Pietrosh, 454 P.2d 106 (Nev. 1969) and its progeny apply 14 in the general liability context. On reconsideration, I am inclined to rule that Century is bound by 15 the default judgment’s findings on liability and damages (capped at $1 million because there was 16 no bad faith). But Century may challenge the binding nature of the default judgment if it was 17 obtained through fraud or collusion. 18 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that oral argument on defendant’s motion for summary 19 judgment (Dkt. #192), plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment (Dkt. #194), plaintiffs’ motion to 20 strike (Dkt. #197), and this Notice of Intent to Reconsider will be held on Thursday, September 21 17, 2015 on a stacked calendar at 2:00 p.m. at the Thomas & Mack Moot Court Room at 22 UNLV’s Boyd School of Law. 23 DATED this 2nd day of September, 2015. 24 25 26 27 28 ANDREW P. GORDON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?