Andrew et al v. Century Surety Company
Filing
57
ORDER Granting 54 MOTION for Leave to File Surreply in Response to Reply to Opposition to 27 MOTION to Amend the Complaint. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 1/8/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM) .
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
SEDGWICK LLP
Maria Louise Cousineau
(Nevada Bar No.: 002876)
maria.cousineau@sedgwicklaw.com
Joshua S. Davis
(Pro Hac Vice)
joshua.davis@sedgwicklaw.com
801 South Figueroa Street, 19th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90017-5556
Telephone:
213.426.6900
Facsimile:
213.426.6921
12
KOLESAR & LEATHAM
Alan J. Lefebvre
(Nevada Bar No. 000848)
alefebvre@klnevada.com
William D. Schuller
(Nevada Bar No. 011271)
wschuller@klnevada.com
400 South Rampart Boulevard, Suite 400
Las Vegas, NV 89145
Telephone:
(702) 362-7800
Facsimile:
(702) 362-9472
13
Attorneys for Defendant CENTURY SURETY COMPANY
8
9
10
11
14
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
17
18
19
DANA ANDREW, as Legal Guardian of
RYAN T. PRETNER, and RYAN PRETNER,
individually,
20
21
22
23
24
Plaintiffs,
v.
CENTURY SURETY COMPANY, a foreign
corporation; and DOES 1-10, inclusive,
Defendant.
25
26
27
28
1
Case No. 2:12-cv-00978-GMN-PAL
Hon. Gloria M. Navarro
(Magistrate Judge Hon. Peggy A. Leen)
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
ORDER GRANTING
CENTURY SURETY COMPANY’S EX
PARTE APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO
FILE A SURREPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS
OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS’
MOTION TO AMEND THE
COMPLAINT
1
For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that the Court grants Defendant CENTURY
2
SURETY COMPANY’s (“Century”) Ex Parte Application for leave to file a surreply in support
3
of its Opposition to Plaintiffs Dana Andrew’s and Ryan Pretner’s Motion to Amend Complaint.
4
DATED this 8th day of January, 2013.
5
6
7
8
________________________________
DATED: ____________
The Honorable Gloria M. Navarro
Gloria M. Navarro
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
United States District Judge
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?