Andrew et al v. Century Surety Company

Filing 57

ORDER Granting 54 MOTION for Leave to File Surreply in Response to Reply to Opposition to 27 MOTION to Amend the Complaint. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 1/8/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM) .

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 SEDGWICK LLP Maria Louise Cousineau (Nevada Bar No.: 002876) maria.cousineau@sedgwicklaw.com Joshua S. Davis (Pro Hac Vice) joshua.davis@sedgwicklaw.com 801 South Figueroa Street, 19th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90017-5556 Telephone: 213.426.6900 Facsimile: 213.426.6921 12 KOLESAR & LEATHAM Alan J. Lefebvre (Nevada Bar No. 000848) alefebvre@klnevada.com William D. Schuller (Nevada Bar No. 011271) wschuller@klnevada.com 400 South Rampart Boulevard, Suite 400 Las Vegas, NV 89145 Telephone: (702) 362-7800 Facsimile: (702) 362-9472 13 Attorneys for Defendant CENTURY SURETY COMPANY 8 9 10 11 14 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 17 18 19 DANA ANDREW, as Legal Guardian of RYAN T. PRETNER, and RYAN PRETNER, individually, 20 21 22 23 24 Plaintiffs, v. CENTURY SURETY COMPANY, a foreign corporation; and DOES 1-10, inclusive, Defendant. 25 26 27 28 1 Case No. 2:12-cv-00978-GMN-PAL Hon. Gloria M. Navarro (Magistrate Judge Hon. Peggy A. Leen) [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ORDER GRANTING CENTURY SURETY COMPANY’S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SURREPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT 1 For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that the Court grants Defendant CENTURY 2 SURETY COMPANY’s (“Century”) Ex Parte Application for leave to file a surreply in support 3 of its Opposition to Plaintiffs Dana Andrew’s and Ryan Pretner’s Motion to Amend Complaint. 4 DATED this 8th day of January, 2013. 5 6 7 8 ________________________________ DATED: ____________ The Honorable Gloria M. Navarro Gloria M. Navarro UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE United States District Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?