Andrew et al v. Century Surety Company

Filing 77

ORDER that the hearing scheduled for May 21, 2013, at 9:30 a.m. is VACATED, as the parties have advised the court that a hearing is no longer required. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 5/20/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 SEDGWICK LLP Maria Louise Cousineau (Nevada Bar No.: 002876) maria.cousineau@sedgwicklaw.com Joshua S. Davis (Pro Hac Vice) joshua.davis@sedgwicklaw.com 801 South Figueroa Street, 19th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90017-5556 Telephone: 213.426.6900 Facsimile: 213.426.6921 12 KOLESAR & LEATHAM Alan J. Lefebvre (Nevada Bar No. 000848) alefebvre@klnevada.com William D. Schuller (Nevada Bar No. 011271) wschuller@klnevada.com 400 South Rampart Boulevard, Suite 400 Las Vegas, NV 89145 Telephone: (702) 362-7800 Facsimile: (702) 362-9472 13 Attorneys for Defendant CENTURY SURETY COMPANY 7 8 9 10 11 14 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 17 18 19 DANA ANDREW, as Legal Guardian of RYAN T. PRETNER, and RYAN PRETNER, individually, Plaintiff, 20 21 22 Case No. 2:12-cv-00978-APG-PAL Hon. Andrew P. Gordon (Magistrate Judge Hon. Peggy A. Leen) JOINT STATUS REPORT RE DISCOVERY DISPUTE v. CENTURY SURETY COMPANY, a foreign corporation; and DOES 1-10, inclusive, 23 Defendant. 24 25 26 Pursuant to Judge Leen’s April 30, 2013 Order, Plaintiffs Dana Andrew, as Legal 27 Guardian of Ryan T. Pretner, and Ryan Pretner, individually, (Plaintiffs) and Defendant Century 28 1 LA/2233279v1 1 Surety Company submit the following Joint Status Report regarding the pending discovery 2 dispute: 3 On May 14, 2013, Century Surety served (by mail and electronically) its Further 4 5 Amended Response to Request for Production of Documents, a copy of which is attached as 6 Exhibit 1 to this Joint Status Report. The following documents were produced with the Further 7 Response: 8 Exhibit 1: Century Surety’s Guide to Claim Best Practices, 9 Exhibit 2: Meadowbrook Insurance Group’s Claim Department Operating 10 Guidelines. 11 Exhibit 3: The reinsurance agreements applicable to the underlying claim 12 Exhibit 4: Those portions of Ms. Henderson’s personnel file which relate to her 13 training, experience, and evaluations that touch upon her claims handling capabilities from the 14 period of 2008 forward. 15 Exhibit 5: Those portions of Mr. Holland’s personnel file which relate to his training, 16 experience, and evaluations that touch upon his claims handling capabilities from the period of 17 2008 forward. Century Surety had no communications with any Reinsurer regarding the underlying 18 19 claim prior to the date this lawsuit was filed and therefore produced no documents in response to 20 Request No 10 (as modified by the Court.) 21 /// 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 2 LA/2233279v1 Century Surety believes there are no remaining issues relating to Plaintiffs motion to 1 2 Compel and therefore requests the Court vacate the scheduled further hearing date of May 21, 3 2013. 4 DATED: May 16, 2013 5 SEDGWICK LLP 6 7 9 By: /s/Maria Louise Cousineau Maria Louise Cousineau Nevada Bar No. 2876 801 S. Figueroa Street, 19th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90017-5556 10 - and – 8 11 KOLESAR & LEATHAM Alan J. Lefebvre (Nevada Bar No. 0848) William D. Schuller (Nevada Bar No. 011271) 400 South Rampart Boulevard, Suite 400 Las Vegas, NV 89145 12 13 14 15 Attorneys for Defendant CENTURY SURETY COMPANY 16 17 18 DATED: May 16, 2013 PRINCE & KEATON 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 By: /s/Dennis M. Prince Dennis M. Prince (Nevada Bar No. 5092) 3230 South Buffalo Drive, Suite 108 Las Vegas, Nevada 89117 IT IS ORDERED that the hearing scheduled for May 21, 2013, at 9:30 a.m. is VACATED, as the parties have advised the court that a hearing is no longer required. Dated this 20th day of May, 2013. _____________________________ Peggy A. Leen United States Magistrate Judge 26 27 28 3 LA/2233279v1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?