Southern Nevada Confederation of Clubs et al v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department et al

Filing 70

MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach, on 12/26/2012. By Deputy Clerk: Mai Tieu. ORDER that the LVMPD Defendants Motion To Stay Discovery Pending Resolution of the LVMPD Defendants Motion To Dismiss (#46) is DENIED as moot. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA *** SOUTHERN NEVADA CONFEDERATION OF CLUBS, et al, Plaintiff, v. LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., Defendants. PRESENT: ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Dated: 2:12-cv-01093-KJD-VCF MINUTE ORDER December 26, 2012 THE HONORABLE CAM FERENBACH, United States Magistrate Judge JUDICIAL ASSISTANT: Mai Tieu RECORDER: None COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): None Appearing COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): None Appearing Before the court is defendants Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, Dave Hunkins, David Lewis, Robert Wills, Joseph Gagliardi, Chris Tomaino, William Schoen, and Sheriff Douglas Gillespie’s (hereinafter “LVMPD Defendants”) Motion To Stay Discovery Pending Resolution of the LVMPD Defendants’ Motion To Dismiss (#36). (#46). Defendants Thomas Finn, Scott Pastore, and Joseph Chronister filed Joinders thereto. (#52, #57, and #60). On December 7, 2012, the parties filed a stipulation and order to stay discovery pending resolution of LVMPD Defendants’ motion to dismiss (#36). (#64). The court signed the stipulation the same day, staying discovery until the earlier of June 7, 2013, or the date on which an order is entered deciding the motion to dismiss (#36). (#65). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the LVMPD Defendants’ Motion To Stay Discovery Pending Resolution of the LVMPD Defendants’ Motion To Dismiss (#46) is DENIED as moot. CAM FERENBACH UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?