Southern Nevada Confederation of Clubs et al v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department et al
Filing
70
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach, on 12/26/2012. By Deputy Clerk: Mai Tieu. ORDER that the LVMPD Defendants Motion To Stay Discovery Pending Resolution of the LVMPD Defendants Motion To Dismiss (#46) is DENIED as moot. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
***
SOUTHERN NEVADA CONFEDERATION
OF CLUBS, et al,
Plaintiff,
v.
LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE
DEPARTMENT, et al.,
Defendants.
PRESENT:
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
) Dated:
2:12-cv-01093-KJD-VCF
MINUTE ORDER
December 26, 2012
THE HONORABLE CAM FERENBACH, United States Magistrate Judge
JUDICIAL ASSISTANT:
Mai Tieu
RECORDER:
None
COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S):
None Appearing
COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S):
None Appearing
Before the court is defendants Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, Dave Hunkins, David Lewis,
Robert Wills, Joseph Gagliardi, Chris Tomaino, William Schoen, and Sheriff Douglas Gillespie’s (hereinafter
“LVMPD Defendants”) Motion To Stay Discovery Pending Resolution of the LVMPD Defendants’ Motion To
Dismiss (#36). (#46). Defendants Thomas Finn, Scott Pastore, and Joseph Chronister filed Joinders thereto.
(#52, #57, and #60).
On December 7, 2012, the parties filed a stipulation and order to stay discovery pending resolution of
LVMPD Defendants’ motion to dismiss (#36). (#64). The court signed the stipulation the same day, staying
discovery until the earlier of June 7, 2013, or the date on which an order is entered deciding the motion to dismiss
(#36). (#65).
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the LVMPD Defendants’ Motion To Stay Discovery Pending
Resolution of the LVMPD Defendants’ Motion To Dismiss (#46) is DENIED as moot.
CAM FERENBACH
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?