Weinstein v. Astrue
Filing
22
ORDER Granting 20 Motion for extension of time to file motion for reversal and or remand. Motions due by 4/26/2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 4/16/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Marc V. Kalagian
Attorney at Law: 4460
Law Offices of
Rohlfing & Kalagian, LLP
211 East Ocean Boulevard, Suite 420
Long Beach, CA 90802
Tel.: (562)437-7006
Fax: (562)432-2935
E-mail marckalagian_rohlfinglaw@hotmail.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Steven Weinstein
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner )
)
of Social Security,
)
)
Defendant
)
)
STEVEN WEINSTEIN,
Case No.: 2:12CV01094 LRN PAL
PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE HIS
MOTION FOR REVERSAL AND/OR
REMAND
18
19
20
21
TO DEFENDANT MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, AS THE COMMISSIONER OF
SOCIAL SECURITY, AND TO HIS ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
Plaintiff Steven Weinstein, by and through his attorneys of record,
22
respectfully requests an extension of time to and including April 26, 2013, in
23
which to file his motion for reversal and/or remand. Marc V. Kalagian requires
24
additional time to allow him to properly research the issues to prepare the motion
25
for reversal and/or remand or otherwise plead.
26
-1-
1
This request is being filed as a motion as the undersigned counsel was
2
unable to timely contact opposing counsel of record for defendant before the filing
3
due date.
4
5
6
7
8
9
DATE: April 12, 2013
Respectfully submitted,
LAW OFFICES OF
ROHLFING & KALAGIAN, LLP
/s/ Marc V. Kalagian
BY: _________________________
Marc V. Kalagian
Attorney for plaintiff Steven Weinstein
10
11
12
13
14
15
IT IS SO ORDERED this 16th day
of April, 2013.
____________________________
Peggy A. Leen
United States Magistrate Judge
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?