Heldt et al v. American Invsco Corporation et al

Filing 84

ORDER Denying without prejudice 82 Objection. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 7/29/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 7 BRUCE COUTURIER, et al., 12 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 13 Pending before the Court is an “objection” to a deposition notice, filed by Meridian Private 8 Plaintiff(s), 9 vs. 10 AMERICAN INVSCO CORP., et al., 11 Defendant(s). Case Nos. 2:12-cv-01104-APG-NJK 2:12-cv-01106-APG-NJK 2:12-cv-01107-APG-NJK 2:12-cv-01108-APG-NJK 2:12-cv-01111-APG-NJK ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE OBJECTION TO DEPOSITION NOTICE 14 Residences CH, LLC on July 29, 2013. Docket No. 80, 2:12-cv-1104-APG-NJK; Docket No. 75, 15 2:12-cv-1106-APG-NJK; Docket No. 82, 2:12-cv-1107-APG-NJK; Docket No. 74, 2:12-cv-1108- 16 APG-NJK; Docket No. 67, 2:12-cv-1111-APG-NJK. For the reasons discussed below, that 17 “objection” is hereby DENIED without prejudice. 18 The pending objection identifies purported deficiencies in a recently-served deposition 19 notice. The objection does not specify what relief (if any) is sought from the Court (e.g., a 20 protective order). Nor does the objection indicate that a proper meet and confer was conducted. See 21 Local Rule 26-7(b). Accordingly, to the extent the “objection” seeks relief from the Court, it is 22 hereby DENIED without prejudice. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 DATED: July 29, 2013 25 26 27 28 ______________________________________ NANCY J. KOPPE United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?