Naoumi v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

Filing 6

ORDER granting 2 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Clerk of Court to file Complaint and serve Commissioner of Social Security by certified mail. Clerk of Court to issue Summons to U.S. Attorney. Plaintiff's counsel, Frederick J. Daley Jr. shall have until 8/14/12 to comply with requirements of Local Rule IA 10-2. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 7/31/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS, cert mail to Soc Sec, summons and complaint to U.S.Atty)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

7
8
9
10
11
12

ROY E. NAOUMI,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF
)
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,
)
)
)
Defendant.
)
__________________________________________)

Case No. 2:12-cv-01140-JCM-PAL
ORDER
(IFP App - Dkt. #1)

13
14

Plaintiff Roy E. Naoumi has requested authority pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 to proceed in

15

forma pauperis and submitted a Complaint (Dkt. #1). This proceeding was referred to this court by

16

Local Rule IB 1-9.

17

I.

18

In Forma Pauperis Application
Plaintiff has submitted the affidavit required by § 1915(a) showing an inability to prepay fees

19

and costs or give security for them. Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis will be

20

granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). The court will now review Plaintiff’s Complaint.

21

II.

22

Screening the Complaint
Upon granting a request to proceed in forma pauperis, a court must additionally screen a

23

complaint pursuant to § 1915(a). Federal courts are given the authority dismiss a case if the action is

24

legally “frivolous or malicious,” fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seeks

25

monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). When a

26

court dismisses a complaint under § 1915(a), the plaintiff should be given leave to amend the complaint

27

with directions as to curing its deficiencies, unless it is clear from the face of the complaint that the

28

///

1

deficiencies could not be cured by amendment. See Cato v. United States, 70 F.3d 1103, 1106 (9th Cir.

2

1995).

3

Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides for dismissal of a complaint for

4

failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Review under Rule 12(b)(6) is essentially a

5

ruling on a question of law. North Star Intern. v. Arizona Corp. Comm’n, 720 F.2d 578, 580 (9th Cir.

6

1983). In considering whether the plaintiff has stated a claim upon which relief can be granted, all

7

material allegations in the complaint are accepted as true and are to be construed in the light most

8

favorable to the plaintiff. Russell v. Landrieu, 621 F.2d 1037, 1039 (9th Cir. 1980). Allegations of a

9

pro se complaint are held to less stringent standards than formal pleading drafted by lawyers. Haines v.

10

Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).

11

Plaintiff’s Complaint challenges a decision by the Social Security Administration (“SSA”)

12

denying Plaintiff disability insurance benefits and Supplemental Security Income benefits. Before

13

Plaintiff can sue the SSA in federal court, he must exhaust his administrative remedies. 42 U.S.C.

14

§ 405(g). See Bass v. Social Sec. Admin., 872 F.2d 832, 833 (9th Cir. 1989) (per curium) (“Section

15

405(g) provides that a civil action may be brought only after (1) the claimant has been party to a hearing

16

held by the Secretary, and (2) the Secretary has made a final decision on the claim”). Generally, if the

17

SSA denies a claimant’s application for disability benefits, he can request reconsideration of the

18

decision. If the claim is denied at the reconsideration level, a claimant may request a hearing before an

19

Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”). If the ALJ denies the claim, a claimant may request review of the

20

decision by the Appeals Council. If the Appeals Council declines to review the ALJ’s decision, a

21

claimant may then request review by the United States District Court. See generally 20 C.F.R. §§ 404,

22

416. Plaintiff alleges that on February 16, 2012, the Appeals Council denied his request for review, and

23

the ALJ’s decision became the final decision of the Commissioner. Thus, it appears Plaintiff has

24

exhausted his administrative remedies.

25

Once Plaintiff has exhausted his administrative remedies, he can obtain review of an SSA

26

decision denying benefits by commencing a civil action within sixty days after notice of a final

27

decision. Id. An action for judicial review of a determination by the SSA must be brought in a District

28

Court of the United States for the judicial district in which the Plaintiff resides. Id. Plaintiff received a
2

1

thirty-day extension of time in which to file a civil action in federal court. See Letter from SSA,

2

attached as Exhibit A to Complaint.

3

The Complaint should state the nature of Plaintiff’s disability, when Plaintiff claims he became

4

disabled, and when and how he exhausted his administrative remedies. It should also contain a plain,

5

short, and concise statement identifying the nature of Plaintiff’s disagreement with the determination

6

made by the Social Security Administration and show that Plaintiff is entitled to relief. A district court

7

can affirm, modify, reverse, or remand a decision if Plaintiff has exhausted his administrative remedies

8

and timely filed a civil action. However, judicial review of the Commissioner’s decision to deny

9

benefits is limited to determining: (a) whether there is substantial evidence in the record as a whole to

10

support the findings of the Commissioner; and (b) whether the correct legal standards were applied.

11

Morgan v. Commissioner of the Social Security Adm., 169 F.3d 595, 599 (9th Cir. 1999).

12

Plaintiff’s Complaint seeks judicial review of the Commissioner’s decision denying Plaintiff

13

disability insurance benefits and Supplemental Security Income benefits and requests the court reverse

14

that decision, or alternatively, remand this matter for a new hearing. Plaintiff contends the

15

Commissioner’s decision was not supported by substantial evidence in the record and contains errors of

16

law. Additionally, Plaintiff alleges the Appeals Council erred in declining review of the ALJ’s decision

17

on February 16, 2012. Accordingly, Plaintiff has stated a claim for initial screening purposes under 28

18

U.S.C. § 1915.

19

III.

20

Local Rule 10-2.
Lastly, the court notes that attorney Frederick J. Daley, Jr. has appeared on behalf of Plaintiff.

21

See Notice of Appearance (Dkt. #3). Mr. Daley is not licensed in Nevada as an attorney, and he is not a

22

member of the Bar of this court. Therefore, pursuant to Local Rule IA 10-2(a), Mr. Daley is required to

23

seek permission to practice in this case by verified petition. Id. Once permission is granted, counsel

24

must associate a resident member of the Bar of this court as co-counsel. See LR 10-2(d); see also

25

Notice to Counsel (Dkt. #5) (requiring Mr. Daley to electronically file a Designation of Local Counsel

26

and a Verified Petition to Practice Pro Hac Vice and to register for the court’s Case Management and

27

Electronic Case Filing system no later than August 13, 2012). Counsel shall comply with all

28

///
3

1

requirements of Local Rule 10-2 no later than August 13, 2012. See LR IA 10-2(e) (allowing counsel

2

forty-five days after first appearance to comply with Rule).

3

Based on the foregoing,

4

IT IS ORDERED that:

5

1.

6

Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall not
be required to pay the filing fee of three hundred fifty dollars.

7

2.

Plaintiff is permitted to maintain this action to conclusion without the necessity of

8

prepayment of any additional fees or costs or the giving of a security therefor. This

9

Order granting leave to proceed in forma pauperis shall not extend to the issuance of

10

subpoenas at government expense.

11

3.

The Clerk of Court shall file the Complaint.

12

4.

The Clerk of the Court shall serve the Commissioner of the Social Security

13

Administration by sending a copy of the summons and Complaint by certified mail to:

14

(1) General Counsel, Social Security Administration, Room 611, Altmeyer Bldg., 6401

15

Security Blvd., Baltimore, Maryland 21235; and (2) the Attorney General of the United

16

States, Department of Justice, 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Room 4400,

17

Washington, D.C. 20530.

18

5.

19

The Clerk of Court shall issue summons to the United States Attorney for the District of
Nevada and deliver the summons and Complaint to the U.S. Marshal for service.

20

6.

From this point forward, Plaintiff shall serve upon Defendant or, if appearance has been

21

entered by counsel, upon the attorney, a copy of every pleading, motion or other

22

document submitted for consideration by the court. Plaintiff shall include with the

23

original paper submitted for filing a certificate stating the date that a true and correct

24

copy of the document was personally served or sent by mail to the defendants or counsel

25

for the defendants. The court may disregard any paper received by a district judge or

26

magistrate judge which has not been filed with the Clerk, and any paper received by a

27

district judge, magistrate judge or the Clerk which fails to include a certificate of service.

28

///
4

1
2
3

7.

Plaintiff’s counsel, Mr. Frederick J. Daley, Jr., shall have until August 14, 2012, to
comply with the requirements of Local Rule IA 10-2.

Dated this 31st day of July, 2012.

4
5
6

________________________________________
PEGGY A. LEEN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
5