Horne v. Ace Ltd. et al

Filing 41

ORDER Granting 38 Motion for Service via Diplomatic Channels. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 12/18/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 8 9 10 11 12 ORLAN CHARLES HORNE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) ACE LTD; et al., ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________) Case No. 2:12-cv-01142-JCM-GWF ORDER Motion for Service via Diplomatic Channels (#38) 13 14 15 This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff Orlan Horne’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion for Service of Process via Diplomatic Channels (#38), filed on December 11, 2012. 16 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(f)(1) permits a party in a foreign country to be served “by 17 any internationally agreed means of service that is reasonably calculated to give notice, such as 18 those authorized by the Hague Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial 19 Documents.” Plaintiff represents that despite diligent attempts, he has been unable to locate a 20 domestic agent to accept service for Defendant Ace Seguros (“Ace”). Although more than120 days 21 have elapsed since Plaintiff filed the Complaint (#1), Rule 4(m)’s time limit “does not apply to 22 service in a foreign country under Rule 4(f)[.]” The United States and Argentina, Ace’s country of 23 residence, are both signatories to the Hague Convention. Accordingly, 24 ... 25 ... 26 ... 27 ... 28 ... 1 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Request Service of Process via 2 Diplomatic Channels (#38) is granted. Plaintiff may pursue service of process under the Hague 3 Convention. 4 DATED this 18th day of December, 2012. 5 6 7 ______________________________________ GEORGE FOLEY, JR. United States Magistrate Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?