Traylor Parker v. Astrue

Filing 20

ORDER Granting 18 Plaintiff's Motion to Serve Party with Summons and Complaint. The Clerk of the Court shall serve the United States Attorney for the District of Nevada by delivering a copy of the 8 Summons and 7 Complaint to the U.S.Mar shal for service. The Clerk of Court shall also re-serve the United States Attorney General with the 8 Summons and 7 Complaint by certified mail, and file proof of service. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 01/08/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 6 7 8 9 10 EVELYN D. TRAYLOR PARKER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF ) SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, ) ) ) Defendant. ) __________________________________________) Case No. 2:12-cv-01152-LDG-PAL ORDER (Mtn to Serve - Dkt. #18) 11 12 13 This matter is before the court on Plaintiff Evelyn Traylor Parker’s Motion to Serve Party with Summons and Complaint (Dkt. #18) filed January 8, 2013. The court has considered the Motion. 14 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action in forma pauperis. On August 1, 2012, the court entered an 15 Order (Dkt. #6) screening Plaintiff’s Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and directing the Clerk of 16 Court to serve the Complaint pursuant to Rule 4(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 17 Specifically, the Screening Order directed the Clerk of the Court to issue summons for and serve 18 process upon the Office of General Counsel for the Social Security Administration (“SSA”) in 19 Baltimore, Maryland; and the Attorney General in Washington, D.C.1 See Order (Dkt. #6). The Clerk 20 issued Summons (Dkt. #8) and mailed them with the Complaint to the Office of General Counsel and 21 the Attorney General by certified mail as directed in the Screening Order. See Certified Mail Receipts 22 (Dkt. ##9, 10). The docket reflects that service is complete on the Office of General Counsel. See 23 Certified Mail Return Receipt (Dkt. #12). No certified mail return receipt has been entered on the 24 docket confirming service on the United States Attorney General. 25 26 27 28 1 Additionally, in an Order (Dkt. #15) entered October 22, 2012, the court granted Plaintiff’s Motion to Serve Additional Party (Dkt. #14), the court directed service on the Office of Regional Chief Counsel for Region IX of the Social Security Administration in San Francisco, California, pursuant to 70 Fed. Reg. 73320 (Dec. 9, 2005). The Clerk complied, and service was returned executed. See Summons Returned Executed (Dkt. #17). 1 Additionally, the Screening Order (Dkt. #6) directed the Clerk of Court to issue summons to the 2 United States Attorney for the District of Nevada and deliver the summons to the U.S. Marshal for 3 service. The Clerk issued Summons (Dkt. #8), but the docket does not reflect that it was delivered with 4 the Complaint to the U.S. Marshal for service or that the U.S. Marshal has effected service of process 5 on the United States Attorney. The Motion represents that Plaintiff has not received confirmation of 6 service on the U.S. Attorney for the District of Nevada and seeks an order directing the Clerk re-serve 7 him. 8 Having reviewed and considered the matter, 9 IT IS ORDERED: 10 1. 11 12 Plaintiff’s Motion to Serve Party with Summons and Complaint (Dkt. #18) is GRANTED. 2. The Clerk of the Court shall serve the United States Attorney for the District of Nevada 13 #7) by delivering a copy of the Summons (Dkt. #8-2) and Complaint (Dkt. #18) to the U.S. 14 Marshal for service. 15 3. The Clerk of Court shall also re-serve the United States Attorney General with the 16 (Dkt. #7) Summons (Dkt. #8) and Complaint (Dkt. #18) by certified mail, and file proof of 17 service. 18 Dated this 8th day of January, 2013. 19 20 21 ________________________________________ PEGGY A. LEEN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?