Traylor Parker v. Astrue
Filing
20
ORDER Granting 18 Plaintiff's Motion to Serve Party with Summons and Complaint. The Clerk of the Court shall serve the United States Attorney for the District of Nevada by delivering a copy of the 8 Summons and 7 Complaint to the U.S.Mar shal for service. The Clerk of Court shall also re-serve the United States Attorney General with the 8 Summons and 7 Complaint by certified mail, and file proof of service. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 01/08/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
5
6
7
8
9
10
EVELYN D. TRAYLOR PARKER,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF
)
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,
)
)
)
Defendant.
)
__________________________________________)
Case No. 2:12-cv-01152-LDG-PAL
ORDER
(Mtn to Serve - Dkt. #18)
11
12
13
This matter is before the court on Plaintiff Evelyn Traylor Parker’s Motion to Serve Party with
Summons and Complaint (Dkt. #18) filed January 8, 2013. The court has considered the Motion.
14
Plaintiff is proceeding in this action in forma pauperis. On August 1, 2012, the court entered an
15
Order (Dkt. #6) screening Plaintiff’s Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and directing the Clerk of
16
Court to serve the Complaint pursuant to Rule 4(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
17
Specifically, the Screening Order directed the Clerk of the Court to issue summons for and serve
18
process upon the Office of General Counsel for the Social Security Administration (“SSA”) in
19
Baltimore, Maryland; and the Attorney General in Washington, D.C.1 See Order (Dkt. #6). The Clerk
20
issued Summons (Dkt. #8) and mailed them with the Complaint to the Office of General Counsel and
21
the Attorney General by certified mail as directed in the Screening Order. See Certified Mail Receipts
22
(Dkt. ##9, 10). The docket reflects that service is complete on the Office of General Counsel. See
23
Certified Mail Return Receipt (Dkt. #12). No certified mail return receipt has been entered on the
24
docket confirming service on the United States Attorney General.
25
26
27
28
1
Additionally, in an Order (Dkt. #15) entered October 22, 2012, the court granted Plaintiff’s
Motion to Serve Additional Party (Dkt. #14), the court directed service on the Office of Regional Chief
Counsel for Region IX of the Social Security Administration in San Francisco, California, pursuant to 70
Fed. Reg. 73320 (Dec. 9, 2005). The Clerk complied, and service was returned executed. See Summons
Returned Executed (Dkt. #17).
1
Additionally, the Screening Order (Dkt. #6) directed the Clerk of Court to issue summons to the
2
United States Attorney for the District of Nevada and deliver the summons to the U.S. Marshal for
3
service. The Clerk issued Summons (Dkt. #8), but the docket does not reflect that it was delivered with
4
the Complaint to the U.S. Marshal for service or that the U.S. Marshal has effected service of process
5
on the United States Attorney. The Motion represents that Plaintiff has not received confirmation of
6
service on the U.S. Attorney for the District of Nevada and seeks an order directing the Clerk re-serve
7
him.
8
Having reviewed and considered the matter,
9
IT IS ORDERED:
10
1.
11
12
Plaintiff’s Motion to Serve Party with Summons and Complaint (Dkt. #18) is
GRANTED.
2.
The Clerk of the Court shall serve the United States Attorney for the District of Nevada
13
#7)
by delivering a copy of the Summons (Dkt. #8-2) and Complaint (Dkt. #18) to the U.S.
14
Marshal for service.
15
3.
The Clerk of Court shall also re-serve the United States Attorney General with the
16
(Dkt. #7)
Summons (Dkt. #8) and Complaint (Dkt. #18) by certified mail, and file proof of
17
service.
18
Dated this 8th day of January, 2013.
19
20
21
________________________________________
PEGGY A. LEEN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?