Wang v. Country Wide Bank, N.A. and BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP et al
Filing
16
ORDER Denying 14 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Serve Defendants Through Counsel. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 15 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint is DENIED without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 1/16/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3
4
JUN Y. WANG,
5
6
7
8
9
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
COUNTRYWIDE BANK, N.A., et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
__________________________________________)
Case No. 2:12-cv-01161-RCJ-CWH
ORDER
10
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Serve Defendants
11
Through Counsel (#14), filed January 14, 2013, and Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Amend
12
Complaint (#15), filed January 14, 2013.
13
Plaintiff has not submitted points and authorities in support of her request to complete
14
service by serving Defendants’ counsel. Nor has Plaintiff shown that a waiver of service was
15
requested under Rule 4(d). “The failure of a moving party to file points an authorities in support of
16
the motion shall constitute a consent to the denial of the motion.” Local Rule (“LR”) 7-2(d).
17
Further, Plaintiff did not attach the proposed amended pleading to her motion to amend. Pursuant
18
to LR 15-1(a), “[u]nless otherwise permitted by the Court, the moving party shall attach the
19
proposed amended pleading to any motion to amend, so that it will be complete in itself without
20
reference to the superseding pleading.” Accordingly,
21
22
23
24
25
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Serve Defendants
Through Counsel (#14) is denied.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint
(#15) is denied without prejudice.
DATED this 16th day of January, 2013.
26
27
28
______________________________________
C.W. Hoffman, Jr.
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?