Staley v. Dameo et al

Filing 3

ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice to the filing of a new complaint in a new action, with a proper in forma pauperis application. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall send plaintiff two copies of an in forma pauperis application , instructions, two copies of a blank 1983 forms and instructions, and a copy of the complaint in the instant action. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff may file a new complaint and in forma pauperis application in a new action, but he may not fil e further documents in this action. Plaintiff shall keep the Court informed of his current address. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 7/30/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 10 ISRAEL STALEY, 11 Plaintiff, 12 vs. 13 ANTHONY DAMEO, et al., 14 Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) / 2:12-cv-01237-GMN-VCF ORDER 15 16 This action is a pro se civil rights complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 by an inmate. 17 On July 13, 2012, the Clerk sent a notice of case number and assignment to plaintiff at his address of 18 record. On July 24, 2012, the correspondence was returned to the Court as undeliverable – markings 19 on the envelope indicate the following: “return to sender – no longer in custody.” (ECF No. 2). 20 Plaintiff has not notified the Court of a new address. 21 22 Rule LSR 2-2 of the Local Rules of Special Proceedings and Appeals provides: 24 The plaintiff shall immediately file with the court written notification of any change of address. The notification must include proof of service upon each opposing party or the party’s attorney. Failure to comply with this rule may result in dismissal of the action with prejudice. 25 In view of plaintiff’s failure to keep the Court informed of his address as required by LSR 2-2, the 26 Court will dismiss this action, as specified at the conclusion of this order. 23 1 Moreover, plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis is incomplete. (ECF No. 1). 2 In addition to filing the proper affidavit of inability to pay filing fees, a prisoner seeking to proceed 3 in forma pauperis “shall submit a certified copy of the trust fund account statement (or institutional 4 equivalent) for the prisoner for the 6-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint 5 . . . obtained from the appropriate official of each prison at which the prisoner is or was confined.” 6 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), (2). Plaintiff in the instant action has failed to submit an in forma pauperis 7 application that provides the necessary financial information and includes a financial certificate 8 signed by an authorized prison or jail officer. 9 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT 10 PREJUDICE to the filing of a new complaint in a new action, with a proper in forma pauperis 11 application in compliance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). 12 IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall send plaintiff two copies of 13 an in forma pauperis application form for a prisoner, one copy of the instructions for same, two 14 copies of a blank 42 U.S.C. § 1983 prisoner civil rights form, one copy of instructions for the same, 15 and a copy of the complaint in the instant action (ECF No. 1-1). 16 17 18 19 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff may file a new complaint and in forma pauperis application in a new action, but he may not file further documents in this action. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in any new action, plaintiff shall keep the Court informed of his current address. 20 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly. 21 DATED this 30th day of July, 2012. 22 23 24 Gloria M. Navarro United States District Judge 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?