Britain et al v. Clark County, Nevada

Filing 88

ORDER Denying without prejudice 87 Stipulation to Extend Time to File Reply in Support of 75 Motion for Collective Action. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 05/06/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 10 TRINA BRITAIN, et al., 15 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 16 Pending before the Court is a stipulation to extend the deadline to file a reply to the second 11 Plaintiff(s), 12 vs. 13 CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA, 14 Defendant(s). Case No. 2:12-cv-1240-JAD-NJK ORDER DENYING STIPULATION TO EXTEND (Docket No. 87) 17 motion for collective action. Docket No. 87. Stipulations to extend Court deadlines are not effective 18 absent Court approval. See Local Rule 7-1(b). A showing of “good cause” is required for requests 19 to extend deadlines. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b)(1). To enable to the Court to make that determination, 20 requests for extensions must “state the reasons for the extension requested.” Local Rule 6-1(b). 21 The pending stipulation provides no reason whatsoever for the requested extension, so the Court 22 cannot find good cause exits. Accordingly, it is hereby DENIED without prejudice. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 DATED: May 6, 2014 25 26 27 28 ______________________________________ NANCY J. KOPPE United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?