Britain et al v. Clark County, Nevada

Filing 88

ORDER Denying without prejudice 87 Stipulation to Extend Time to File Reply in Support of 75 Motion for Collective Action. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 05/06/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
9
10
TRINA BRITAIN, et al.,

15

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

16

Pending before the Court is a stipulation to extend the deadline to file a reply to the second

11
Plaintiff(s),
12
vs.
13
CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA,
14
Defendant(s).

Case No. 2:12-cv-1240-JAD-NJK
ORDER DENYING STIPULATION
TO EXTEND
(Docket No. 87)

17

motion for collective action. Docket No. 87. Stipulations to extend Court deadlines are not effective

18

absent Court approval. See Local Rule 7-1(b). A showing of “good cause” is required for requests

19

to extend deadlines. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b)(1). To enable to the Court to make that determination,

20

requests for extensions must “state the reasons for the extension requested.” Local Rule 6-1(b).

21

The pending stipulation provides no reason whatsoever for the requested extension, so the Court

22

cannot find good cause exits. Accordingly, it is hereby DENIED without prejudice.

23

IT IS SO ORDERED.

24

DATED: May 6, 2014

25
26
27
28

______________________________________
NANCY J. KOPPE
United States Magistrate Judge