Alsabagh v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals America, Inc. et al

Filing 10

ORDER that Plaintiff and Defendants shall file their Certificate as to Interested Parties, which fully complies with LR 7.1-1 no later than August 13, 2012. Failure to comply may result in the issuance of an order to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 7/1/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ALLEN K. ALSABAGH, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS AMERICA, ) INC., et al., ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________) Case No. 2:12-cv-01245-JCM-GWF ORDER 14 This matter is before the Court on the parties’ failure to file a Certificate as to Interested 15 Parties as required by LR 7.1-1. Counsel for Defendant removed this matter to federal court on 16 July 13, 2012. LR 7.1-1 requires that counsel for private parties shall, upon entering a case, file a 17 certificate as to interested parties, listing all persons, firms, partnerships or corporations, known to 18 have an interest in the outcome of the case, including the names of all parent subsidiary, affiliate 19 and/or insider of the named non-individual parties. If there are no known interested parties, other 20 than those participating in the case, a statement to that effect must be filed. To date, Plaintiff and 21 Defendants have failed to comply. Accordingly, 22 IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff and Defendants shall file their Certificate as to Interested 23 Parties, which fully complies with LR 7.1-1 no later than August 13, 2012. Failure to comply may 24 result in the issuance of an order to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed. 25 DATED this 1st day of August, 2012. 26 27 28 _______________________________________ GEORGE FOLEY, JR. United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?