Wu v. Prem-Mortgage Inc, et al

Filing 15

ORDER Granting 8 Defendants' Motion for Leave to Respond to 1 Complaint and 3 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction. Defendants shall have 10 days from the date of this order in which to file responses. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 1/29/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 7 8 9 10 11 AL FANG WU, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) PREM-MORTGAGE, INC., et al., ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________) Case No. 2:12-cv-01306-RCJ-PAL ORDER (Mot Leave Respond - Dkt. #8) 12 13 Before the court is Defendants’ Motion for Leave to (1) Respond to Complaint and (2) Respond 14 to Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Dkt. #8) filed November 28, 2012, which has been referred to the 15 undersigned by the district judge for a ruling. Plaintiff did not file a response and the time for filing a 16 response has now run. 17 LR 7-2(d) states that the failure of an opposing party to file points and authorities in response to 18 any motion shall constitute a consent to the granting of the motion. As no opposition has been filed, the 19 court will grant the motion. A proposed answer is attached to Defendants’ motion, and on January 28, 20 2013 Defendants filed a motion to dismiss (Dkt #12). The same day the district judge issued the court’s 21 standard order informing the Plaintiff of the requirements for responding to the motion. 22 IT IS ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion for Leave to (1) Respond to Complaint and (2) 23 Respond to Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Dkt. #8) is GRANTED. Defendants shall have ten days 24 from the date of this order in which to file their responses. 25 Dated this 29th day of January, 2013. 26 27 28 ______________________________________ Peggy A. Leen United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?