Panliant Financial Corporation et al v. ISEE3D, Inc. et al

Filing 85

ORDER granting, with Modifications, 82 Motion to Extend Discovery Deadlines re 48 Scheduling Order. Discovery due by 2/20/2015. Motions due by 3/23/2015. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 4/21/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 11/10/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

7

PANLIANT FINANCIAL CORP., et al.,

8
9
10

Plaintiffs,
vs.
ISEE3D, Inc., et al.,

11

Defendants.

12
13
14

Case No.: 2:12-cv-01376-PMP-CWH
SCHEDULING ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion to Extend Discovery Deadlines (doc.
# 82), filed October 8, 2014. No opposition was filed to Plaintiffs’ motion.

15
16

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

The Court, having reviewed Plaintiffs’ motion, finds good cause to grant the extension
sought. Accordingly,

17

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Motion to Extend Discovery Deadlines (doc.

18

# 82) is granted with the following modifications:

19

1.

Discovery cutoff

February 20, 2015

20

2.

Expert designations

December 22, 2014

21

3.

Rebuttal expert designations

January 21, 2015

22

4.

Interim status report

December 22, 2014

23

5.

Dispositive motions

March 23, 2015

24

6.

Pretrial order

April 21, 2015

25

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any other motions to extend the discovery deadlines will

26

not be allowed without a showing of good cause as to why all discovery was not completed within

27

the time allotted. All motions or stipulations to extend discovery shall be received by the Court at

28

least twenty-one (21) days prior to the date fixed for completion of discovery or at least twenty-one

1

(21) days prior to the expiration of any extension thereof that may have been approved by the Court.

2
3

The motion or stipulation shall include:
1.

A statement specifying the discovery completed by the parties as of the date of the motion
or stipulation;

2.

A specific description of the discovery which remains to be completed;

3.

The reasons why such remaining discovery was not completed within the time limit of the
existing discovery deadline; and,

4.

A proposed schedule for the completion of all remaining discovery.

4
5
6
7
8

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if no dispositive motions have been filed within the time

9

frame specified in this Order, then the parties shall file a written, jointly proposed Pretrial Order by

10

April 21, 2015. If dispositive motions are filed, then the parties shall file a written, jointly proposed

11

Pretrial Order within 30 days of the date the Court enters a ruling on said dispositive motions.

12

DATED: November 10, 2014

13
14
15
16

C.W. Hoffman, Jr.
United States Magistrate Judge

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-