Leung et al v. BAC Home Loans Servicing,LP et al

Filing 27

ORDER that 25 Motion for Clarification of Judgment is GRANTED. The Clerk shall file an amended judgment. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 3/27/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
7
8

FUNG YING LEUNG, et al.,

9
10
11
12
13
14

2:12-CV-1393 JCM (VCF)

Plaintiff(s),
v.
MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC
REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., et
al.,
Defendant(s).

15
16
17
18

ORDER
Presently before the court is defendant BAC Home Loans Servicing LP’s motion for
clarification of judgment. (Doc. # 25). No responses or replies have been filed.

19

Three defendants filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint. (Doc. # 11). Other

20

defendants filed a joinder to the motion to dismiss. (Doc. # 20). In this mortgage fraud case, this

21

court dismissed all of plaintiffs’ claims with prejudice. (Doc. # 23). The clerk of the court entered

22

judgment in favor of Merscorp, Inc., Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., Ocwen Home

23

Loans Servicing LP, and BAC Home Loan Ass-Inc, and against the plaintiff.

24

Defendants BAC Home Loans Servicing LP and Countrywide Home Loan Servicing LP

25

move the court to amend the judgment to include them. The court finds that BAC Home Loans

26

Servicing LP was improperly omitted off of the clerk’s judgment. However, Countrywide Home

27
28
James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge

1

Loan Servicing LP has already been terminated.1

2

Accordingly,

3

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that defendant BAC Home

4

Loans Servicing LP motion for clarification of judgment (doc. # 25) be, and the same hereby, is

5

GRANTED consistent with the foregoing.

6

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk of the court shall file an amended judgment.

7

DATED March 27, 2013.

8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

1

Countrywide had already been terminated from this case. Plaintiffs listed Countrywide in

the caption of the amended complaint; however, plaintiffs did not allege any causes of action against
Countrywide in the body of the complaint. Countrywide was terminated from the case on the date

26
27
28
James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge

that plaintiffs filed the amended complaint. Countrywide’s termination from the case is reflected
in the caption on CM/ECF.
-2-