Cohen et al v. Hansen et al

Filing 181

ORDER that 119 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED without prejudice. FURTHER ORDERED that 145 Motion for Hearing is DENIED. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 5/22/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 8 BRADLEY STEPHEN COHEN, et al., 9 10 11 2:12-CV-1401 JCM (PAL) Plaintiff(s), v. ROSS B. HANSEN, et al., 12 Defendant(s). 13 14 ORDER Presently before the court is the matter of Cohen, et al. v. Hansen, et al., case no. 2:12-cv- 15 16 1401-JCM-PAL. 17 Defendants have filed a motion for summary judgment (doc. # 119) which is briefed and ripe 18 for review. In the interim, however, the parties have been engaged in motion practice relating to 19 issues of damages, which go directly to the viability of certain claims that are the subject of the 20 motion for summary judgment. Accordingly, the court has been unable to address the motion. 21 Several weeks ago the magistrate judge held a hearing on defendants’ motion to exclude 22 evidence of plaintiffs’ actual damages and thereafter issued an order. (Docs. # 177, 178). Plaintiffs 23 have now filed simultaneous motions for clarification (doc. # 179) and for reconsideration (doc. # 24 180). These motions have triggered further briefing. 25 The pending motion for summary judgment will be denied without prejudice. The court will 26 permit the motion to be revised and re-filed when the pending motions are resolved. 27 ... 28 James C. Mahan U.S. District Judge 1 Accordingly, 2 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that defendants’ motion for 3 4 5 6 summary judgment (doc. # 119) be, and the same hereby is, DENIED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs’ motion for a hearing on the summary judgment (doc. # 145) be, and the same hereby is, DENIED. DATED May 22, 2014. 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 James C. Mahan U.S. District Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?