Gonzalez v. Las Vegas Metropolitian Police Department et al

Filing 36

ORDER Granting 32 Motion to Dismiss. The matter is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 11/15/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 7 PEDRO GONZALEZ and DEBORAH GONZALEZ, 2:12-CV-1474 JCM (PAL) 8 Plaintiff, 9 10 v. 11 LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., 12 Defendants. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 ORDER Presently before the court is defendant United States’, (incorrectly named in the complaint as the “Social Security Administration, Las Vegas,”) motion to dismiss. (Doc. # 21). Also before the court is plaintiffs Pedro and Deborah Gonzalez’s motion to dismiss. (Doc. # 32). Defendants have filed a response. (Doc. # 35). 20 Plaintiffs, acting pro se, have filed a complaint alleging seven causes of action related to their 21 treatment by certain individuals at the Social Security Administration and Las Vegas Metropolitan 22 Police Department. (Doc. # 7). Defendant filed a motion to dismiss based on insufficient service of 23 process. In response, plaintiffs filed their own motion to dismiss without prejudice. The defendant 24 concedes the matter should be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). (See 25 doc. # 35). 26 27 28 James C. Mahan U.S. District Judge 1 Accordingly, 2 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that plaintiffs’ motion to dismiss 3 4 (doc. # 32) be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED. The matter is dismissed without prejudice. DATED November 15, 2013. 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 James C. Mahan U.S. District Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?