Gonzalez v. Las Vegas Metropolitian Police Department et al

Filing 36

ORDER Granting 32 Motion to Dismiss. The matter is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 11/15/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)

1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
7

PEDRO GONZALEZ and DEBORAH
GONZALEZ,

2:12-CV-1474 JCM (PAL)

8
Plaintiff,

9
10

v.

11

LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN
POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al.,

12

Defendants.

13
14
15
16
17
18
19

ORDER
Presently before the court is defendant United States’, (incorrectly named in the complaint
as the “Social Security Administration, Las Vegas,”) motion to dismiss. (Doc. # 21).
Also before the court is plaintiffs Pedro and Deborah Gonzalez’s motion to dismiss. (Doc.
# 32). Defendants have filed a response. (Doc. # 35).

20

Plaintiffs, acting pro se, have filed a complaint alleging seven causes of action related to their

21

treatment by certain individuals at the Social Security Administration and Las Vegas Metropolitan

22

Police Department. (Doc. # 7). Defendant filed a motion to dismiss based on insufficient service of

23

process. In response, plaintiffs filed their own motion to dismiss without prejudice. The defendant

24

concedes the matter should be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). (See

25

doc. # 35).

26
27
28
James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge

1

Accordingly,

2

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that plaintiffs’ motion to dismiss

3
4

(doc. # 32) be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED. The matter is dismissed without prejudice.
DATED November 15, 2013.

5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge

-2-