Boyd et al v. General Motors Company
Filing
32
ORDER DISMISSING CASE Granting 31 Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 2/5/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
Case 2:12-cv-01485-JCM-GWF Document 31 Filed 02/03/14 Page 1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
l0
1t
g
blË.
øø
l=l
F
I
niia
t2
13
Èt å Eii$
,) i o l)zP.
SNELL & WILMER
r,.r,.p.
3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100
Las Vegas, NV 89169
Telephone : (7 02) 7 84-5200
Facsimile: (702) 784-5252
Email : i schuttert@ swlaw.com
Email : c gperkins@ swlaw. com
Andrew L. Richa¡dson (Pro Hac Vice)
Mary Quinn Cooper (Pro Hac Vice)
Harold C. Zuckerman(Pro Hac Vice)
McAFEE & TAFT
l7l7 S. Boulder, Suite 900
Tulsa, OK74II9
Telephone: (918) 587-0000
Facsimile: (918) 599-9317
Email: andrew.richardson@mcafeetaft .com
Email: maryquinn.cooper@mcafeetaft .com
Email : harold.zuckerman@mcafeetaft .com
Attorneys for Defendant
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY
T4
,El
Jay J. Schuttert
Nevada Bar No. 8656
Casey G. Perkins
Nevada Bar No. 12063
l6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
rì;sp l5
3
ãl-ri
ãr
g
T7
DISTRICT OF'NEVADA
MATTHEW BOYD, a Minor, By and
Through RANDALL BOYD, Individually
and a Parent and Natural Guardian
18
T9
CASE NO. 2: 12-cv-01485-JCM-GWF
of
MATTHEW BOYD, a Minor; MARY
BOYD, Individually and as Parent and
Natural Guardian of MATTHEW BOYD,
Minor,
a
STIPULATION AND ORDER F'OR
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
20
Plaintiffs,
2t
vs
22
23
24
25
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY, A
Delaware Corporation; DOE
DEFENDANTS I - XX; and ROE
CORPORATIONS I - XX, inclusive,
Defendants.
26
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Plaintiffs MATTHEW
27
BOYD, a Minor, By and Through RANDALL BOYD, Individually and a Parent and Natural
28
Guardian of MATTHEW BOYD, a Minor; and MARY BOYD, Individually and as Parent and
Case 2:12-cv-01485-JCM-GWF Document 31 Filed 02/03/14 Page 2 of 3
of MATTHEW BOYD, a Minor, and Defendant GENERAL
I
Natural Guardian
2
COMPANY, through their respective counsel of record, that this matter shall be dismissed in its
3
entirety, with prejudice. The parties further stipulate and agree that each party shall bear their
4
own costs and attorneys' fees.
5
DATED
7
By
DATED tni,{du:of January, 2014.
of January ,2014
SNELL & V/ILMER
6
I
t¡ist¿ay
GERALD I. GILLOCK
& ASSOCIATES
r..r.,p.
,+,P
/
By:
Jay J. Schuffert
9
l0
1l
o
É
tg
:
I
tô
lø€
l-r
t2
3*r*=
o I
I ;¡
Ê
(n rf
H
Ba¡No.0051
John C. Funk
Nevada BarNo. 9255
428 South Fourth Street
Las Vegas, NV 89101
Attorneys for Defendant
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
13
jäs*Ë
,z r >Ë;ñ
I
Nevada Bar No. 8656
Casey G. Perkins
Nevada Bar No. 12063
3883 Howard Hughes Pkwy., Ste. 1100
Las Vegas, NV 89169
Ë I niis
I Ëitq t4
15
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED this
day
February 5, 2014.of January,2}L4.
16
t7
UNITED DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
18
T9
Prepared and Submitted by:
SNELL & V/ILMER r.r.p.
20
2l
22
23
24
25
MOTORS
Jay J. Schuttert
Nevada Bar No. 8656
Casey G. Perkins
Nevada Bar No. 12063
3883 Howa¡d Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100
Las Vegas, NV 89169
Attorneys for Defendant
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY
26
27
28
-2
-
Case 2:12-cv-01485-JCM-GWF Document 31 Filed 02/03/14 Page 3 of 3
CERTIX'ICATE OF SERVICE
1
I, the undersigned, declare under penalty of perjtry, that I am over the age of eighteen
2
I am not a party to, nor interested in, this action.
On this date,
I
to
3
(18) years, and
4
served
a true and correct copy of the foregoing STIPULATION AND ORDER
FOR
5
DISMISSAL \ilITH PREJUDICE by electronic service (via Case Management/Electronic
Case
6
Filing) to the following:
7
Gerald I. Gillock, Esq.
John C. Funk, Esq.
I
9
t0
11
o
bl
=
Ë^
Ë I niî'
i Ëj;î
) 3oiz?
c(J
Pr
I
È*rydr
GERALD I. GILLOCK & ASSOCIATES
428 South Fourth Street
Las Vegas, NV 89101
Telephone: (702) 385-1482
Facsimile: (702) 385-2604
Email: eillock@gmk-laW.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
T2
l3
DATED this
a h,L of Febiltry, 2014.
day
t4
-r lSEiÉ
UDI
I
15
16
õlrì ìi
cl
Ë
E
t7
L.L.P
18626632
l8
t9
20
2t
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-J-
caused
be
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?