Boyd et al v. General Motors Company

Filing 32

ORDER DISMISSING CASE Granting 31 Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 2/5/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)

Download PDF
Case 2:12-cv-01485-JCM-GWF Document 31 Filed 02/03/14 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 l0 1t g blË. øø l=l F I niia t2 13 Èt å Eii$ ,) i o l)zP. SNELL & WILMER r,.r,.p. 3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100 Las Vegas, NV 89169 Telephone : (7 02) 7 84-5200 Facsimile: (702) 784-5252 Email : i schuttert@ swlaw.com Email : c gperkins@ swlaw. com Andrew L. Richa¡dson (Pro Hac Vice) Mary Quinn Cooper (Pro Hac Vice) Harold C. Zuckerman(Pro Hac Vice) McAFEE & TAFT l7l7 S. Boulder, Suite 900 Tulsa, OK74II9 Telephone: (918) 587-0000 Facsimile: (918) 599-9317 Email: andrew.richardson@mcafeetaft .com Email: maryquinn.cooper@mcafeetaft .com Email : harold.zuckerman@mcafeetaft .com Attorneys for Defendant GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY T4 ,El Jay J. Schuttert Nevada Bar No. 8656 Casey G. Perkins Nevada Bar No. 12063 l6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT rì;sp l5 3 ãl-ri ãr g T7 DISTRICT OF'NEVADA MATTHEW BOYD, a Minor, By and Through RANDALL BOYD, Individually and a Parent and Natural Guardian 18 T9 CASE NO. 2: 12-cv-01485-JCM-GWF of MATTHEW BOYD, a Minor; MARY BOYD, Individually and as Parent and Natural Guardian of MATTHEW BOYD, Minor, a STIPULATION AND ORDER F'OR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 20 Plaintiffs, 2t vs 22 23 24 25 GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY, A Delaware Corporation; DOE DEFENDANTS I - XX; and ROE CORPORATIONS I - XX, inclusive, Defendants. 26 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Plaintiffs MATTHEW 27 BOYD, a Minor, By and Through RANDALL BOYD, Individually and a Parent and Natural 28 Guardian of MATTHEW BOYD, a Minor; and MARY BOYD, Individually and as Parent and Case 2:12-cv-01485-JCM-GWF Document 31 Filed 02/03/14 Page 2 of 3 of MATTHEW BOYD, a Minor, and Defendant GENERAL I Natural Guardian 2 COMPANY, through their respective counsel of record, that this matter shall be dismissed in its 3 entirety, with prejudice. The parties further stipulate and agree that each party shall bear their 4 own costs and attorneys' fees. 5 DATED 7 By DATED tni,{du:of January, 2014. of January ,2014 SNELL & V/ILMER 6 I t¡ist¿ay GERALD I. GILLOCK & ASSOCIATES r..r.,p. ,+,P / By: Jay J. Schuffert 9 l0 1l o É tg : I tô lø€ l-r t2 3*r*= o I I ;¡ Ê (n rf H Ba¡No.0051 John C. Funk Nevada BarNo. 9255 428 South Fourth Street Las Vegas, NV 89101 Attorneys for Defendant GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY Attorneys for Plaintiffs 13 jäs*Ë ,z r >Ë;ñ I Nevada Bar No. 8656 Casey G. Perkins Nevada Bar No. 12063 3883 Howard Hughes Pkwy., Ste. 1100 Las Vegas, NV 89169 Ë I niis I Ëitq t4 15 ORDER IT IS SO ORDERED this day February 5, 2014.of January,2}L4. 16 t7 UNITED DISTRICT COURT JUDGE STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 18 T9 Prepared and Submitted by: SNELL & V/ILMER r.r.p. 20 2l 22 23 24 25 MOTORS Jay J. Schuttert Nevada Bar No. 8656 Casey G. Perkins Nevada Bar No. 12063 3883 Howa¡d Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100 Las Vegas, NV 89169 Attorneys for Defendant GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY 26 27 28 -2 - Case 2:12-cv-01485-JCM-GWF Document 31 Filed 02/03/14 Page 3 of 3 CERTIX'ICATE OF SERVICE 1 I, the undersigned, declare under penalty of perjtry, that I am over the age of eighteen 2 I am not a party to, nor interested in, this action. On this date, I to 3 (18) years, and 4 served a true and correct copy of the foregoing STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR 5 DISMISSAL \ilITH PREJUDICE by electronic service (via Case Management/Electronic Case 6 Filing) to the following: 7 Gerald I. Gillock, Esq. John C. Funk, Esq. I 9 t0 11 o bl = Ë^ Ë I niî' i Ëj;î ) 3oiz? c(J Pr I È*rydr GERALD I. GILLOCK & ASSOCIATES 428 South Fourth Street Las Vegas, NV 89101 Telephone: (702) 385-1482 Facsimile: (702) 385-2604 Email: eillock@gmk-laW.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs T2 l3 DATED this a h,L of Febiltry, 2014. day t4 -r lSEiÉ UDI I 15 16 õlrì ìi cl Ë E t7 L.L.P 18626632 l8 t9 20 2t 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -J- caused be

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?