NNN Siena Office Park I 2, LLC et al v. Wachovia Bank National Association et al

Filing 37

ORDER responding to 36 LETTER requesting status of 10 MOTION to Dismiss. The 10 Motion to Dismiss does not fall within the category that requires expedited disposition and will therefore be decided in the order of pending motions in civil cases. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 1/15/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

6

***

7

NNN SIENA OFFICE PART I 2, LLC,
et al.,

Case No. 2:12-cv-01524-MMD-PAL

8
Plaintiffs,

ORDER

9
v.

(Letter Requesting Status of Motion to
Dismiss – dkt. no. 36)

10
11

WACHOVIA BANK NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION, now known as WELLS
FARGO BANK, N.A., et al.,

12
Defendants.
13
14

Before the Court is Defendant Wells Fargo’s application for a status check as to

15

the disposition of its Motion to Dismiss (dkt. no. 10) pursuant to Local Rule 7-6(b). (Dkt.

16

no. 36.) The Motion to Dismiss was filed on September 4, 2012, and was ripe and fully

17

submitted to the Court on October 1, 2012. (See dkt. no. 23.) The Court disposes of

18

pending civil motions in chronological order, except for those motions that require

19

disposition on an expedited basis. The Court has several pending motions remaining

20

from the period before August 30, 2012, and will be moving chronologically to motions

21

filed through August 2012. The Motion to Dismiss does not fall within the category that

22

requires expedited disposition and will therefore be decided in the order of pending

23

motions in civil cases.

24

DATED THIS 15th day of January 2013.

25
26
27
28

MIRANDA M. DU
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE