NNN Siena Office Park I 2, LLC et al v. Wachovia Bank National Association et al
Filing
37
ORDER responding to 36 LETTER requesting status of 10 MOTION to Dismiss. The 10 Motion to Dismiss does not fall within the category that requires expedited disposition and will therefore be decided in the order of pending motions in civil cases. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 1/15/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
***
7
NNN SIENA OFFICE PART I 2, LLC,
et al.,
Case No. 2:12-cv-01524-MMD-PAL
8
Plaintiffs,
ORDER
9
v.
(Letter Requesting Status of Motion to
Dismiss – dkt. no. 36)
10
11
WACHOVIA BANK NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION, now known as WELLS
FARGO BANK, N.A., et al.,
12
Defendants.
13
14
Before the Court is Defendant Wells Fargo’s application for a status check as to
15
the disposition of its Motion to Dismiss (dkt. no. 10) pursuant to Local Rule 7-6(b). (Dkt.
16
no. 36.) The Motion to Dismiss was filed on September 4, 2012, and was ripe and fully
17
submitted to the Court on October 1, 2012. (See dkt. no. 23.) The Court disposes of
18
pending civil motions in chronological order, except for those motions that require
19
disposition on an expedited basis. The Court has several pending motions remaining
20
from the period before August 30, 2012, and will be moving chronologically to motions
21
filed through August 2012. The Motion to Dismiss does not fall within the category that
22
requires expedited disposition and will therefore be decided in the order of pending
23
motions in civil cases.
24
DATED THIS 15th day of January 2013.
25
26
27
28
MIRANDA M. DU
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?