Bradley et al v. United States of America

Filing 29

ORDER Granting 28 Unopposed Motion to Reopen Case and Rescind 26 Order Dismissing Case and 27 Clerk's Judgment. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 5/28/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 *** 8 9 10 SHANNON BRADLEY, individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of RICHARD WILLIAMS, deceased, SEAN WILLIAMS and PATRICK WILLIAMS, ORDER REOPENING CASE AND RESCINDING ORDER DISMISSING CASE [DKT #26] Plaintiffs, 11 v. 12 13 Case No. 2:12-cv-01526 -APG-GWF UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. 14 15 16 On May 21, 2013, the Court entered its Order Dismissing Case Without Prejudice 17 [Dkt. #26]. That Order was based upon Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [Dkt. #15] filed 18 November 16, 2012. Subsequent to entry of the Order dismissing this case, Plaintiffs 19 filed a Motion to Reopen Case [Dkt. #28]. That Motion points out that, after the Motion to 20 Dismiss [Dkt. #15] had been fully briefed, Plaintiffs filed a companion case (2:13-cv-250) 21 alleging the same facts set forth in the Complaint in this case, but attaching the requisite 22 Affidavit that had been missing from the first Complaint. The second-filed case (2:12-cv- 23 0250) was consolidated into this case on March 5, 2013, and the second-filed case was 24 closed. 25 Plaintiffs contend that the consolidation of the second-filed Complaint into this 26 case cures the defects in the original Complaint. Defendants’ counsel concurs with 27 28 1 Plaintiffs’ Motion to Reopen this case, and has no objection to the Complaint being 2 reinstated. Accordingly, 3 4 5 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Court’s May 21, 2013 Order [Dkt. #26] and Clerk’s Judgment [Dkt. #27] are rescinded and this case is reopened. Dated: May 28, 2013 6 ANDREW P. GORDON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?