Bradley et al v. United States of America
Filing
29
ORDER Granting 28 Unopposed Motion to Reopen Case and Rescind 26 Order Dismissing Case and 27 Clerk's Judgment. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 5/28/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
7
***
8
9
10
SHANNON BRADLEY, individually and as
Personal Representative of the Estate of
RICHARD WILLIAMS, deceased, SEAN
WILLIAMS and PATRICK WILLIAMS,
ORDER REOPENING CASE AND
RESCINDING ORDER DISMISSING
CASE [DKT #26]
Plaintiffs,
11
v.
12
13
Case No. 2:12-cv-01526 -APG-GWF
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant.
14
15
16
On May 21, 2013, the Court entered its Order Dismissing Case Without Prejudice
17
[Dkt. #26]. That Order was based upon Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [Dkt. #15] filed
18
November 16, 2012. Subsequent to entry of the Order dismissing this case, Plaintiffs
19
filed a Motion to Reopen Case [Dkt. #28]. That Motion points out that, after the Motion to
20
Dismiss [Dkt. #15] had been fully briefed, Plaintiffs filed a companion case (2:13-cv-250)
21
alleging the same facts set forth in the Complaint in this case, but attaching the requisite
22
Affidavit that had been missing from the first Complaint. The second-filed case (2:12-cv-
23
0250) was consolidated into this case on March 5, 2013, and the second-filed case was
24
closed.
25
Plaintiffs contend that the consolidation of the second-filed Complaint into this
26
case cures the defects in the original Complaint. Defendants’ counsel concurs with
27
28
1
Plaintiffs’ Motion to Reopen this case, and has no objection to the Complaint being
2
reinstated. Accordingly,
3
4
5
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Court’s May 21, 2013 Order [Dkt. #26] and
Clerk’s Judgment [Dkt. #27] are rescinded and this case is reopened.
Dated: May 28, 2013
6
ANDREW P. GORDON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?