Bradley et al v. United States of America

Filing 49

ORDER Granting 47 Motion to Extend Deadlines. Discovery due by 7/30/2014. Motions due by 8/29/2014. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 10/1/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 4/11/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
Case 2:12-cv-01526-APG-GWF Document 47 Filed 04/10/14 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 DANIEL G. BOGDEN United States Attorney District of Nevada JUSTIN E. PINGEL Assistant United States Attorney Nevada State Bar No. 10186 333 Las Vegas Boulevard South, Suite 5000 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Telephone: (702) 388-6336 Facsimile: (702) 388-6787 justin.pingel@usdoj.gov 7 Attorneys for the United States. 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 12 13 SHANNEN BRADLEY, individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of RICHARD WILLIAMS, deceased, SEAN WILLIAMS and PATRICK WILLIAMS, 14 Plaintiffs, 15 v. 16 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 17 Defendant. 18 19 20 ) ) ) Case No. 2:12-cv-01526-APG-GWF ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OF DISCOVERY DEADLINES (Third Request) (Fourth Request) 21 The United States of America (“United States”) respectfully requests an extension of time of 22 thirty (30) days for all remaining discovery deadlines in order to allow the parties to complete 23 settlement discussions that have been ongoing. 24 In support of the instant Motion, the United States submits the following: 25 1. 26 This Motion is brought in order to accommodate the undersigned counsel for the United States. 1 Case 2:12-cv-01526-APG-GWF Document 47 Filed 04/10/14 Page 2 of 3 1 2. On January 29, 2014, the current Scheduling Order was granted by the Court (ECF 2 #43) setting revised discovery deadlines. Since that time, the parties have been discussing a possible 3 settlement in this case. Although discussions are continuing, they will not conclude before some of 4 the discovery deadlines must be met. Specifically, over the course of the parties’ settlement 5 discussions a new issue has arisen that is quite complex and will require additional time to evaluate, 6 resolve, and determine its application to the settlement value of this case. 7 3. Undersigned counsel and Plaintiff’s counsel have agreed a thirty (30) day extension of 8 time is needed, and that postponing the remaining discovery deadlines during this period of time is in 9 the best interest of both parties. 10 4. The following deadlines would apply: 11 a. Discovery ends July 30, 2014. 12 b. Expert disclosures due June 2, 2014. 13 c. Rebuttal experts due July 2, 2014. 14 d. Dispositive motions due August 29, 2014. 15 e. Joint Pretrial Order due October 1, 2014. 16 5. 17 WHEREFORE, for the above reasons, the United States respectfully requests the instant 18 19 20 The instant motion is filed in good faith and not for the purposes of delay. Motion extending time of all discovery deadlines for thirty (30) days be granted. Respectfully submitted this 10th day of April 2014. DANIEL G. BOGDEN United States Attorney 21 22 /s/ Justin E. Pingel JUSTIN E. PINGEL Assistant United States Attorney 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED: 25 26 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE GEORGE FOLEY, JR. UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE United States Magistrate Judge DATED: DATED: April 11, 2014 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?