Clockwork IP, LLC et al v. Aladdin One Hour HVAC, Inc.

Filing 24

ORDER Granting in part and Denying in part 20 Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Discovery. Defendant shall have until 07/22/2013, in which to serve counsel for Plaintiff with documents responsive to the request for production of documents and subpoena duces tecum previously served on the Defendant. See Order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 07/05/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 7 8 9 10 11 CLOCKWORK IP, LLC, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) ALADDIN ONE HOUR HVAC, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) __________________________________________) Case No. 2:12-cv-01532-MMD-PAL ORDER (Mot Compel Discovery - Dkt. #20) 12 13 Before the court Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Discovery, Request for Sanctions, and Motion to 14 Change the Name of Defendant to Aladdin One Hour HVAC, Inc., to Honest Abe’s AC Repair, Inc. 15 (Dkt. #20). The court has considered the Motion, the Declaration of Ryan Loosvelt in Support of the 16 Motion (Dkt. #21), and Plaintiff’s Notice of Non-Opposition (Dkt. #23). No opposition to the motion 17 was filed and the time for filing a response has now run. 18 Plaintiffs filed a Complaint August 28, 2012. Defendant failed to answer or otherwise appear. 19 A default was entered on September 27, 2012. Plaintiff requested and received leave to conduct 20 damages discovery needed to calculate actual damages and to support a motion for default judgment. 21 See Motion (Dkt. #13), and Order (Dkt. #14). On November 28, 2012, Plaintiffs issued a subpoena 22 pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 45, along with a Notice of Deposition pursuant to Rule 30(b)(6), setting the 23 deposition for January 17, 2013. A subpoena duces tecum was also issued November 28, 2012, which 24 required production of responsive documents by January 4, 2013. No objection or a motion for 25 protective order was filed in response to the subpoenas, the deposition notice or the request for 26 production. 27 28 Counsel for Plaintiffs attests in his supporting declaration that he has been in communication with Anese Haddad, the President of Defendant Aladdin. On January 10, 2013, Mr. Haddad sent a fax 1 to Plaintiffs’ counsel indicating that he was filing a certificate of amendment to the articles of 2 incorporation to change the entity’s name to Honest Abe’s AC Repair, Inc. On January 11, 2013, 3 counsel for Plaintiff sent a fax to Mr. Haddad demanding that he cease and desist from infringing on 4 Plaintiffs’ trademark and pointing out that Defendant had ignored the discovery which had been served 5 and that Plaintiffs would seek sanctions. However, Defendant failed to respond in any way to 6 Plaintiffs’ written discovery and failed to appear for the January 17, 2013, deposition. 7 Plaintiffs seek costs in the amount of $358.75 for service of the subpoena to testify at the 8 deposition, preparing the notice of deposition, and court reporter fees related to the deposition. 9 Plaintiffs also seek attorney’s fees in the amount of $925.00 for preparing for and attending the 10 deposition, and attorney’s fees in the amount of $5,968.00 in preparing this motion, for a total award of 11 sanctions in the amount of $7,251.75. 12 The motion is supported by the declaration of Ryan A. Loosvelt and its supporting exhibits 13 consisting of the subpoenas and proof of service of the subpoenas and notice of deposition on the 14 registered agent for the Defendant corporation. A copy of the certificate of amendment to the articles of 15 incorporation is also attached. It contains a declaration by the board of directors that the board of 16 directors met and voted to change the name from Aladdin One Hour HVAC Service, Inc., to Honest 17 Abe’s AC Repair, Inc. 18 The Defendant has not responded to the motion and did not appear for a duly-noticed Rule 19 30(b)(6) deposition or respond to the subpoena duces tecum and request for production of documents. 20 Pursuant to LR 7-2(d) “the failure of an opposing party to file points and authorities in response to any 21 motion shall constitute a consent to the granting of the motion.” The court will therefore grant 22 Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel the Defendant corporation to respond to the subpoena duces tecum, 23 produce responsive documents, and appear for a Rule 30(b)(6) deposition. However, the court will 24 deny the request for monetary sanctions as inadequately supported. There is a single paragraph of the 25 Loosvelt declaration which indicates the amount of costs and fees incurred related to the deposition 26 without itemization or information concerning the attorney’s hourly rate, experience, or the usual and 27 customary hourly rate for similar services. Counsel requests sanctions of nearly $6,000.00 for 28 preparing a simple ten-page motion on a routine discovery matter, half of which consists of the 2 1 procedural history of this case. The request made to reimburse counsel for 10.9 hours at the rate of 2 $390/hr., and 3.4 hours at the rate of $505/hr. is excessive for the amount of work reflected in the 3 moving papers. 4 Having reviewed and considered the matter, 5 IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel is GRANTED in part and DENIED in 6 part as follows: 7 1. Defendant shall have until July 22, 2013, in which to serve counsel for Plaintiff with 8 documents responsive to the request for production of documents and subpoena duces 9 tecum previously served on the Defendant. 10 2. The Defendant corporation shall produce a fully-educated Rule 30(b)(6) designee 11 authorized to bind the corporation on the subject matters of the deposition topic 12 contained in the notice of deposition previously served on the Defendant. 13 3. Counsel for Plaintiff shall re-notice the Rule 30(b)(6) deposition of the Defendant 14 corporation no earlier than thirty days from entry of this order, and shall serve the 15 deposition notice along with a copy of this order on the Defendant corporation at its last 16 known business address and through its registered agent. 17 4. Plaintiffs’ request for monetary sanctions is DENIED. 18 5. Plaintiffs’ request for contempt sanctions is DENIED. However, Defendant is warned 19 that failure to comply with this order compelling cooperation in discovery, that is, 20 responding to document requests and providing a corporate designee to respond to the 21 questions on the topics contained in the deposition notice may result in the imposition of 22 additional sanctions, including sanctions for contempt of court. 23 6. Plaintiffs’ request to amend the caption to reflect the change of name is GRANTED, 24 and the Clerk of the Court shall amend the caption to reflect the name of Defendant 25 Aladdin One Hour HVAC, Inc., a Nevada Corporation, now known as Honest Abe’s 26 AC Repair, Inc. 27 /// 28 /// 3 1 7. Any request for relief not specifically addressed in this order is DENIED. 2 Dated this 5th day of July, 2013. 3 4 5 ______________________________________ Peggy A. Leen United States Magistrate Judge 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?