Dominguez v. Williams et al
Filing
5
ORDER Denying 3 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis as Moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall FILE and ELECTRONICALLY SERVE the 1 petition on the Respondents. Respondents shall have forty-five (45) days from entr y of this order within which to answer, or otherwise respond to, the petition. If an answer is filed, petitioner shall have forty-five (45) days from the date of service of the answer to file a reply. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 11/19/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
7
8
IVAN DOMINGUEZ,
9
Petitioner,
10
vs.
11
BRIAN E. WILLIAMS, et al.,
12
Respondents.
13
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
/
2:12-cv-01609-GMN-GWF
ORDER
14
Ivan Dominguez is a Nevada prisoner who has filed petition for a writ of habeas corpus,
15
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. In response to this court’s order, he has both submitted an application to
16
proceed in forma pauperis (ECF #3), as well as paid the filing fee (see ECF #4). Accordingly, his
17
application to proceed in forma pauperis will be denied as moot.
18
The habeas petition shall be filed and docketed, and it shall be served upon the
19
respondents.
20
A petition for federal habeas corpus should include all claims for relief of which
21
petitioner is aware. If petitioner fails to include such a claim in his petition, he may be forever barred
22
from seeking federal habeas relief upon that claim. See 28 U.S.C. §2254(b) (successive petitions). If
23
petitioner is aware of any claim not included in his petition, he should notify the court of that as soon
24
as possible, perhaps by means of a motion to amend his petition to add the claim.
25
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that petitioner’s application to proceed in forma
26
pauperis (ECF #3) is DENIED as moot.
1
2
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall FILE and ELECTRONICALLY
SERVE the petition (see ECF #1) on the respondents.
3
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents shall have forty-five (45) days from
4
entry of this order within which to answer, or otherwise respond to, the petition. In their answer or other
5
response, respondents shall address any claims presented by petitioner in his petition as well as any
6
claims presented by petitioner in any Statement of Additional Claims. Respondents shall raise all
7
potential affirmative defenses in the initial responsive pleading, including lack of exhaustion and
8
procedural default. Successive motions to dismiss will not be entertained. If an answer is filed,
9
respondents shall comply with the requirements of Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Proceedings in the
10
United States District Courts under 28 U.S.C. §2254. If an answer is filed, petitioner shall have forty-
11
five (45) days from the date of service of the answer to file a reply.
12
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, henceforth, petitioner shall serve upon the Attorney
13
General of the State of Nevada a copy of every pleading, motion, or other document he submits for
14
consideration by the court. Petitioner shall include with the original paper submitted for filing a
15
certificate stating the date that a true and correct copy of the document was mailed to the Attorney
16
General. The court may disregard any paper that does not include a certificate of service. After
17
respondents appear in this action, petitioner shall make such service upon the particular Deputy Attorney
18
General assigned to the case.
19
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any state court record exhibits filed by respondents
20
herein shall be filed with a separate index of exhibits identifying the exhibits by number or letter. The
21
CM/ECF attachments that are filed further shall be identified by the number or numbers (or letter or
22
23
24
25
26
2
1
letters) of the exhibits in the attachment. The hard copy of any additional state court record exhibits
2
shall be forwarded – for this case – to the staff attorneys in Reno.
3
4
Dated, this19th day of November, 2012.
___
5
6
___________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?