Brenes et al vs Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department et al

Filing 91

ORDER. The court ISSUES an indicative ruling pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 62.1(a)(3) that 90 plaintiff's unopposed motion raises a substantial issue. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 5/19/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 *** 7 LYDIA VASQUEZ-BRENES, et al., 8 Plaintiff(s), 9 10 11 Case No. 2:12-CV-1635 JCM (VCF) ORDER v. LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., Defendant(s). 12 13 Presently before the court is plaintiffs’ unopposed motion requesting that this court provide 14 15 16 17 written indication pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 62.1 and Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 12.1(b) that the court is willing to entertain a motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(a). Plaintiffs seek clarification regarding this court’s treatment of their pendant state law 18 19 20 21 22 claims, arguing that the Ninth Circuit’s memorandum in this action did not discuss the state claims. (ECF No. 90). Specifically, they wish the court would articulate if the pendant state law claims were dismissed without prejudice in connection with a decision not to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over those claims. (Id.). Plaintiffs also seek clarification whether the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department 23 24 25 26 27 28 James C. Mahan U.S. District Judge would remain a party to this case due to a vicarious liability theory, though the specific claims against that defendant have been resolved. (Id.). ... ... ... 1 Accordingly, 2 The court ISSUES an indicative ruling pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 3 4 62.1(a)(3) that plaintiff’s unopposed motion raises a substantial issue. DATED May 19, 2017. 5 6 __________________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 James C. Mahan U.S. District Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?