Brenes et al vs Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department et al

Filing 92

ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that plaintiffs shall submit their rule 60(a) motion to this court within seven (7) days of the date of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs shall indicate whether their motion is unopposed. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 6/8/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

6

***

7

LYDIA VASQUEZ-BRENES, et al.,

8
9
10
11

Case No. 2:12-CV-1635 JCM (VCF)
Plaintiff(s),

ORDER

v.
LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE
DEPARTMENT, et al.,
Defendant(s).

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge

Presently before the court is the appellate commissioner’s order remanding the ongoing
appeal in this case “for the limited purpose of enabling the district court to consider appellants’
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(a) motion.” Lydia Vasquez-Brenes, et al v. LVMPD, et al, 1715492, docket entry 11 at 1 (9th Cir. May 25, 2017).
There is currently no rule 60(a) motion on the district court docket.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that plaintiffs shall submit
their rule 60(a) motion to this court within seven (7) days of the date of this order.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs shall indicate whether their motion is
unopposed.
DATED June 8, 2017.
__________________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE