Toromanova v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 71

ORDER Granting 70 Motion to expunge lis pendens and for an order to show cause. Show Cause Response due within 20 days. Submission of Proposed Order due within 10 days. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 9/24/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 *** ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 9 DIMITRITZA TOROMANOVA 10 Plaintiff, 11 v. 12 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; et al., 13 Defendants. 2:12-cv-1637-LRH-CWH ORDER 14 15 Before the court is defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.’s (“Wells Fargo”) renewed motion to 16 expunge lis pendens and for an order to show cause why plaintiff Dimitritza Toromanova 17 (“Toromanova”) should not be held in contempt of court. Doc. #70.1 Plaintiff Toromanova did not 18 file an opposition or otherwise respond to this motion. 19 Plaintiff Toromanova filed a complaint in state court against defendants for wrongful 20 foreclosure. See Doc. #1, Exhibit A. Wells Fargo removed the action to federal court on the basis of 21 diversity jurisdiction. Doc. #1. Eventually, Wells Fargo filed a motion to dismiss (Doc. #10) which 22 was granted by the court (Doc. #35). Thereafter, Wells Fargo filed the present motion to expunge 23 lis pendens. Doc. #70. 24 25 The failure of an opposing party to file points and authorities in response to any motion shall constitute a consent to the granting of the motion under LR 7-2(d). Moreover, the court finds 26 1 Refers to the court’s docket entry number. 1 that defendant’s motion to expunge lis pendens is warranted based on the court’s order of 2 dismissal. Doc. #35. Accordingly, the court shall grant Wells Fargo’s motion to expunge lis 3 pendens. 4 Additionally, the court finds that plaintiff Toromanova recorded the underlying lis pendens 5 against the subject property without first obtaining leave of court as required by the court’s 6 January 7, 2013 order. See Doc. #35, p. 3 (“Plaintiff Dimitritza Toromanova is declared a 7 VEXATIOUS LITIGANT and is PERMANENTLY ENJOINED from filing any further actions 8 against defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. relating to the subject property or recording any 9 documents against the subject property without first obtaining leave of Court.”). It appearing that 10 Toromonova has violated the court’s order, the court shall order her to show cause why she should 11 not be held in contempt of court. 12 13 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendant’s motion to expunge lis pendens (Doc. #70) 14 is GRANTED. Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. shall have ten (10) days to submit an 15 appropriate proposed order expunging the lis pendens and submit the same for approval and 16 signature. 17 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff Dimitritza Toromanova shall have twenty (20) 18 days from entry of this order to show cause why she should not be held in contempt of court for 19 violating the court’s January 7, 2013 order. 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 DATED this 24th day of September, 2014. 22 23 __________________________________ LARRY R. HICKS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?