Toromanova v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
Filing
73
ORDER Expunging Lis Pendens. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 9/26/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
Case 2:12-cv-01637-LRH-CWH Document 72 Filed 09/25/14 Page 1 of 2
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
DIMITRITZA TOROMANOVA, an
Individual,
)
)
) Case No.:
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; WACHOVIA )
MORTGAGE, FSB; NATIONAL DEFAULT )
SERVICING CORP; and TIFFANY K.
)
LABO,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
11
2:12-cv-1637-LRH-(CWH)
ORDER EXPUNGING LIS PENDENS
this action by the filing a Complaint in the Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County, Nevada.
14
On August 27, 2012, the plaintiff, Dimitritza Toromanova (“Toromanova”), commenced
13
10161
PARK
R UN
DRIVE,
SUITE
150
LAS
V EGAS,
NEVADA
89145
12
(See Doc. #1-1.1) In connection with this action, on August 27, 2012, Toromanova also filed a
15
Notice of Pendency of Action (Doc. #1-3 at 2), which she recorded with the Clark County
16
Recorder’s Office as Instrument No. 201208300003060 on August 30, 2012 (the “2012 Lis
17
Pendens”). Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”) removed the action to this Court
18
by filing a Petition for Removal on September 18, 2012. (See Doc. #1.) On September 25, 2012,
19
Wells Fargo filed a Motion to Dismiss and to Expunge Lis Pendens and Motion for Order
20
Declaring Plaintiff a Vexatious Litigant (Docs. #10, #11, and #12.) Likewise, Defendant
21
National Default Servicing Corporation (“NDSC”) filed a motion to dismiss on September 25,
22
2012 (Doc. #8) and Defendant Tiffany K. Labo (“Labo”) filed a motion to dismiss on October 1,
23
2012 (Doc. #14). On January 7, 2013, this Court entered an order granting the defendants’
24
motions to dismiss and to expunge the lis pendens and declaring Toromanova a vexatious
25
litigant. (Doc. #35). Accordingly, the Court entered an order expunging the 2012 Lis Pendens.
26
(Doc. #38).
27
28
1
Refers to the Court’s docket entry number.
1
Case 2:12-cv-01637-LRH-CWH Document 72 Filed 09/25/14 Page 2 of 2
1
On August 2, 2013, Toromanova filed a new Notice of Pendency of Action (Docs. #60
2
and #61), which she recorded with the Clark County Recorder’s Office as Instrument No.
3
201308020003192 that same day (the “2013 Lis Pendens”). Consequently, Wells Fargo filed a
4
Motion to Expunge Lis Pendens seeking an order canceling the 2013 Lis Pendens. (Doc. #64).
5
Toromanova failed to file points and authorities in response to the motion. There being no
6
opposition filed, and good cause appearing therefor, on March 21, 2014, the Court entered an
7
order granting the Motion (Doc. #66), and on March 26, 2014, the Court entered its Order
8
Expunging Lis Pendens. (Doc. #68).
Recorder’s Office as Instrument No. 20140611-0003163 (the “Re-Recorded Lis Pendens”). On
11
July 31, 2014, Wells Fargo filed a Motion for Order to Show Cause Why Plaintiff Should Not Be
12
Held in Contempt and to Expunge Lis Pendens seeking, among other things, an order expunging
13
the Re-Recorded Lis Pendens. (Doc. #70). Toromanova failed to file points and authorities in
14
On June 11, 2014, Toromanova re-recorded the 2013 Lis Pendens with the Clark County
10
10161
PARK
R UN
DRIVE,
SUITE
150
LAS
V EGAS,
NEVADA
89145
9
response to the motion. There being no opposition on file, and good cause appearing therefor, on
15
September 25, 2014, the Court entered an order granting the motion. (Doc. #71).
16
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Notice of Pendency of Action filed on August 2,
17
2013 and re-recorded with the Clark County Recorder’s Office on June 11, 2014 as Instrument
18
No. 20140611-0003163 against real property located at 2912 Hot Cider Avenue, North Las
19
Vegas, Nevada 89031, more particularly identified as Clark County APN #124-32-415-039, shall
20
be and hereby is expunged and released in full.
21
IT IS SO ORDERED.
22
DATED this _____ day of September 2014.
26th
23
24
25
26
27
HONORABLE LARRY R. HICKS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?