Doe v. Hirigoyen

Filing 51

ORDER that the parties shall, within 10 days, either submit a proposed discovery plan in compliance with LR 26-1(e), or a proposed plan stating on it's face SPECIAL SCHEDULING REVIEW REQUESTED. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 1/2/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

7
8
9
10
11
12

JANE DOE, an individual,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
RICHARD ROE, an individual,
)
)
Defendant.
)
__________________________________________)

Case No. 2:12-cv-01644-MMD-GWF
ORDER

13
14

This matter is before the Court on the parties’ failure to file a proposed Stipulated

15

Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order. A Report of the Parties’ Planning Meeting (#50) was filed

16

on December 31, 2013. The Court had granted a temporary stay of discovery allowing the parties

17

to conduct a mediation. The second of two settlement conferences was conducted on December 10,

18

2013, but no settlement was reached. The parties advised a case planning conference was

19

conducted as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f); however, the parties did not file the mandatory

20

stipulated discovery plan and scheduling order. LR 26-1(e)(1) provides that unless otherwise

21

ordered, discovery periods longer than one hundred eighty (180) days from the date the first

22

defendant answers or appears will require special scheduling review. LR 26-1(d) states that if

23

longer deadlines are sought, the plan shall state on its face “SPECIAL SCHEDULING REVIEW

24

REQUESTED.” Where such special scheduling review is requested, the plan shall state the

25

reasons why longer or different time periods should apply. Accordingly,

26

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties shall, within ten (10) days of the date of this

27

order, either submit a proposed discovery plan in compliance with LR 26-1(e), or a proposed plan

28

...

1

stating on its face “SPECIAL SCHEDULING REVIEW REQUESTED” and setting forth therein

2

the reasons why longer or different time periods should apply.

3

DATED this 2nd day of January, 2014.

4
5
6

______________________________________
GEORGE FOLEY, JR.
U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2