DeAundray v. Foster et al
Filing
44
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 41 Motion to Stay Summary Judgment. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 1/2/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
***
7
8
9
DeAUNDRAY GASTON,
2:12-cv-1655-GMN-NJK
Plaintiff,
10
11
12
vs.
ORDER
SHERYL FOSTER, et al.,
Plaintiff’s Motion to Stay (Docket No. 41)
Defendants.
13
14
15
16
Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Stay Summary Judgment (Docket No. 41).
For the reasons discussed below, Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED.
17
The Court has inherent power to control its docket, including the discretion to stay
18
proceedings. Landis v. N. Am. Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254-55 (1936). The determination of whether to
19
stay proceedings is best determined by weighing the competing interests of the parties and of the
20
Court. Id.
21
22
23
24
25
“Among those competing interests are the possible damage which may result from the
granting of a stay, the hardship or inequity which a party may suffer in being required to go
forward, and the orderly course of justice measured in terms of the simplifying or
complicating of issues, proof, and questions of law which could be expected to result from a
stay.”
Lockyer v. Mirant Corp., 398 F.3d 1098, 1110 (9th Cir. 2005); citing Landis, 299 U.S. at 268.
Here, Plaintiff has provided no explanation for why the summary judgment determination
26
should be stayed. Plaintiff requests a stay pending a decision on the “First Amended Complaint”
27
filed on August 12, 2013; however, the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge has already
28
recommended the District Judge enter an order striking the referenced amended complaint.
1
Accordingly,
2
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Stay Summary Judgment (Docket No.
3
41) is DENIED.
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
DATED: January 2, 2014.
6
7
______________________________________
NANCY J. KOPPE
United States Magistrate Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?